Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

A randomized controlled trial investigating the neurocognitive effects of Lacprodan® PL-20, a phospholipid-rich milk protein concentrate, in elderly participants with age-associated memory impairment: the Phospholipid Intervention for Cognitive Ageing Reversal (PLICAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 3
Trials201314:404

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-404

  • Received: 17 July 2013
  • Accepted: 11 November 2013
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Age-related cognitive decline (ARCD) is of major societal concern in an ageing population, with the development of dietary supplements providing a promising avenue for amelioration of associated deficits. Despite initial interest in the use of phospholipids (PLs) for ARCD, in recent years there has been a hiatus in such research. Because of safety concerns regarding PLs derived from bovine cortex, and the equivocal efficacy of soybean-derived PLs, there is an important need for the development of new PL alternatives. Phospholipids derived from milk proteins represent one potential candidate treatment.

Methods

In order to reduce the effects of age-associated memory impairment (AAMI) the Phospholipid Intervention for Cognitive Ageing Reversal (PLICAR) was developed to test the efficacy of a milk protein concentrate rich in natural, non-synthetic milk phospholipids (Lacprodan® PL-20). PLICAR is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-groups study where 150 (N = 50/group) AAMI participants aged > 55 years will be randomized to receive a daily supplement of Lacprodan® PL-20 or one of two placebos (phospholipid-free milk protein concentrate or inert rice starch) over a 6-month (180-day) period. Participants will undergo testing at baseline, 90 days and 180 days. The primary outcome is a composite memory score from the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Secondary outcomes include cognitive (verbal learning, working memory, prospective and retrospective memory, processing speed and attention), mood (depression, anxiety, stress and visual analogue scales), cardiovascular (blood pressure, blood velocity and pulse wave pressure), gastrointestinal microbiota and biochemical measures (oxidative stress, inflammation, B vitamins and Homocysteine, glucoregulation and serum choline). Allelic differences in the Apolipoprotein E and (APOE) and Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene will be included for subgroup analysis. A subset (N = 60; 20/group)) will undergo neuroimaging using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in order to further explore in vivo central mechanisms of action of Lacprodan® PL-20. This study will enable evaluation of the efficacy of milk-derived phospholipids for AAMI, and their mechanisms of action.

Trial Registration

The trial is jointly funded by Arla Foods and Swinburne University of Technology, currently recruiting and is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry as ACTRN12613000347763.

Keywords

  • Pulse Wave Velocity
  • Prospective Memory
  • Rice Starch
  • Milk Protein Concentrate
  • Rapid Visual Information Processing

Background

Cognitive deficits including learning and memory impairment are one of the most prominent and debilitating consequences of normal and pathological ageing in humans. A consistent finding in research on ageing and cognition is that performance across various tests of memory is lower with increased age. Meta-analyses of cross-sectional and longitudinal datasets have demonstrated approximately 40 to 60% decline in cognitive speed at age 80 compared to age 20 years in non-demented adults [1]. These cognitive deficits are of considerable concern to elderly individuals, with up to 50% of adults aged 64 years or older reporting difficulties with their memory [2]. There is an increasing awareness of the possibility that dietary modification can alter the course of age-related cognitive decline.

Frequent dairy food intake is associated with better cognitive function, although the exact underlying mechanisms are yet to be determined. The positive correlation between increased dairy intake and cognitive function seems partly to be a result of counteracting metabolic syndrome, by reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk factors such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity and hyperlipedimia [35]. In a recent paper by Crichton et al. [6], the authors support this link and in addition argue that apart from counteracting the CV risk factors, dairy consumption provides additional benefits in relation to cognitive function (for example, after adjusting for CV disease, lifestyle and dietary factors). Recent advances in dairy manufacturing, which enable the enrichment of phospholipid components in milk also offer a promising new avenue for the treatment of age-related cognitive decline.

Phospholipids and the amelioration of cognitive decline

Bovine milk contains a vast range of phospholipids and complex lipids, with important biological functions. Phospholipids are substances with both a hydrophilic (water-liking) head and hydrophobic (water-repellent) tail segment which are major building blocks for cellular membranes, including neuronal cells, where they arrange themselves into lipid bilayers [7]. Relevant phospholipids in relation to cognitive performance include phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) as well as the related substances sphingomyelin and the sialic-acid-containing gangliosides. Pharmacokinetic studies of PS have revealed good bioavailability when consumed orally. Following ingestion, the headgroup is absorbed intact through the intestinal wall into the bloodstream, while the fatty-acid tail segments at position 2 are often removed and later re-added. After crossing the blood–brain barrier the fatty acid at position 2 is typically occupied by either oleic (C18:1) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6) in the brain [8, 9].

Phosphatidylserine (PS)

PS is a naturally occurring membrane phospholipid that is found in high concentrations in brain tissue, where it comprises 10 to 20% of the total phospholipid pool [10]. PS plays an important role in a host of cellular functions including mitochondrial membrane integrity, presynaptic neurotransmitter release, postsynaptic receptor activity and activation of protein kinase C in memory formation [7, 11]. PS enhances the activities of membrane-bound enzymes involved in signal transduction [12] and plays a key role in the biosynthesis and release of several neurotransmitters, including acetylcholine [13, 14], norepinephrine [15], serotonin and dopamine [16]. PS has also been found to elevate glucose metabolism [17].

In relation to the cholinergic system, PS has been found to restore age-related decreases in choline-acetyltransferase-positive neurons [18] as well as densities of muscarinic and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors [19, 20]. Increases in nerve growth factor (NGF)-receptor density have been reported in aged animals following PS supplementation, as well as increases in neuronal numbers and size [21]. Other beneficial effects of PS supplementation include protection from cell death [22] due to increased membrane fluidity [23] as well as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [24]. Behavioural animal experiments using PS have provided evidence of improvements in spatial memory [25], retention of passive avoidance [15], exploration and memory retrieval [26] as well as improvement of avoidance performance [27]. Prevention of scopolamine-induced learning deficits have also been reported [2831], together with an attenuation of memory deficits associated with reserpine-induced catecholamine depletion [32].

PS is the most studied of the phospholipids in regards to human clinical trials of dementia and cognitive decline. Five double-blind randomized trials have been conducted using PS in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [3337]. Clinical global impressions of change and activities of daily living were found to be improved with daily doses of 200 to 300 mg up to six months. In milder cases of AD, significant improvements to concentration, learning and memory for names, locations and recent events were also observed [7, 11]. In the largest of these studies involving 494 elderly patients with moderate to severe cognitive decline, Cenacchi et al. [37] reported improvements to memory and learning following 300 mg PS/day for 6 months.

In elderly populations with mild cognitive impairment and age-associated memory impairment (AAMI), PS has also been found to be effective in ameliorating cognitive declines. Crook et al. [38] administered 300 mg/day PS to 149 elderly patients (aged 50 to 75 years) with age-associated memory impairment for 12 weeks, and observed significant improvements in performance tests of learning and recall abilities such as name-face matching. In a multi-centre trial by Villardita et al. [39], 300 mg/day PS versus placebo was administered to 170 elderly patients for 90 days. Significant improvements in attention, concentration and short-term memory were found in those receiving PS. These earlier trials were conducted using PS derived from bovine cortex, but more recently trials have also been conducted using soybean (SB)-derived PS due to concerns over bovine spongiform encephalopathy. The results in relation to SB-PS have been more mixed, with Jorissen et al. [40] reporting no significant effects on learning and memory, whereas more recently Vakhaporva et al. [41] and Kato-Kataoka et al. [42] reported significant improvements to verbal learning following ≥3 months supplementation. An intriguing study by Hellhammer et al. [43] using the same milk-derived phospholipids as the current study (PL-20) also reported improvements to working memory function following 3 weeks supplementation in healthy adults aged 30 to 55 years.

Phosphatidylcholine (PC)

Choline is an essential nutrient critically needed for synthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine; important in brain functions, such as memory and mood, but also important in skeletal-muscle control, heart rate and breathing. Numerous animal studies demonstrate that choline is necessary for normal development of the memory function and sub-optimal dietary intake of choline by the pregnant mother and later by the infant and child directly affects brain development and results in permanent changes in brain function (Zeisel et al. 1991). Choline or its metabolites, are also needed for the structural integrity and signaling functions of cell membranes; it is the major source of methyl-groups in the diet (one of choline’s metabolites, betaine, participates in the methylation of homocysteine (HCy) to form methionine), and it directly affects cholinergic neurotransmission, transmembrane signaling and lipid transport/metabolism [44, 45]. Nagata et al. [46] documented recently that dietary supplements of PhosChol compounds (1,2-dilinoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; DL-PC and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PO-PC) ) enhanced the memory and learning ability in the elderly in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). In another placebo-controlled clinical trial, Ladd et al. [47] found that the supplementation of SB-PC in normal college students lead to an improvement in explicit memory function due to increased choline supply and improved cholinergic function.

A poor folate status is associated with cognitive decline and dementia in older adults [48]. Although impaired brain methylation activity and HCy toxicity are widely thought to account for this association, how folate deficiency impairs cognition is still uncertain. Troen et al. [49] found a correspondence of cognitive outcomes to changes in brain membrane PC content (in rats), which suggests that altered PC and possibly choline metabolism might contribute to the manifestation of folate deficiency-related cognitive dysfunction. Up to 50% of older people have been reported to have folate deficiency, with higher levels in those institutionalized [50]. For this reason, there is a sound theoretical reasoning to speculate on a positive beneficial outcome in relation to cognition and boosting memory with choline and choline-containing compounds [44].

Elevated total homocysteine (tHcy), a risk factor for many chronic diseases including cognitive decline, can be remethylated to methionine by folate [51]. Alternatively, tHcy can be metabolized by other 1-carbon nutrients, that is, betaine and its precursor, choline. Elias et al. [48] reported that tHcy levels are inversely associated with visual-spatial organization, working memory, scanning-tracking, and abstract reasoning. Chiuve et al. [52] assessed the association between the dietary intakes of betaine and choline and the concentration of tHcy. They found the total choline + betaine intake to be inversely associated with tHcy. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial Olthof et al. [53] investigated the supplementation with soybean PC (PhosChol) on homocysteine plasma concentrations in men with mildly elevated levels. They found that PC was able to reduce homocysteine levels, thus supporting the link between dietary intake of PC and homocysteine plasma levels.

Gangliosides

Brain content of specific gangliosides (for example, GM1) has been documented to decrease with age, and a low GM1 content has been observed in the brains of patients with AD [54]. Exogenously administered gangliosides have been shown to exhibit neurotrophic action, and to increase the release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in vitro[55]. Experimental data have shown that gangliosides, and in particular, GM1, exhibit properties similar to the neurotrophins. The neurotrophins promote neurogenesis, which is essential for specific cognitive functions that decline in some neurological disorders and in ageing [56]. A systemic administration of GM1 in rats ameliorated the age-related decreased activity of choline acetyl transferase and choline uptake in the brain of aged rats as well as improved spatial learning and memory tasks in the aged rats [57]. Dietary gangliosides increase total brain-ganglioside content in rats [58].

Sphingomyelin (SM)

The myelin content of the brain decreases with age and the age-related slowing in cognitive processing speed is associated with myelin integrity in a very healthy elderly population [59]. Dietary bovine SM contributes to central nervous system (CNS) myelination [60]. Sphingomyelin is also a source of choline. Clinical trials are yet to be conducted in order to assess the in vivo neurocognitive effects of SM in humans.

Methods/Design

Phospholipid intervention for cognitive ageing reversal (PLICAR) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, stratified parallel-groups clinical trial with participants randomized to receive a minimum daily dosage of 2.7 g phospholipids (and minimum daily dose of 300 mg/day PS) from Lacprodan® PL-20 or one of two placebos (milk protein concentration or rice starch) over a 180-day (6-month) period. The maximum daily dose of Lacprodan® PL-20 will be 16 g/day. Participants will be stratified according to age, IQ using Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM) [61] and baseline score on the Wechlser Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) [62].

Aims and study hypotheses

The primary objective of the current study is to evaluate the chronic effects of daily Lacprodan® PL-20 supplementation on cognitive performance in a healthy elderly population with age-associated memory impairment (AAMI). The secondary objectives of the study are to investigate mood and CV effects of Lacprodan® PL-20 as well as the in vivo mechanisms of action by which Lacprodan® PL-20 may improve cognitive function. To this end, a range of measurement modalities will be employed including assessments of CV function, blood biomarkers, gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota, pharmacogenomics and brain activity assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), magnetoencephalography (MEG) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

Performance on the various outcome measures for participants receiving Lacprodan® PL-20 will be compared to the performance of participants receiving (i) an inert placebo powder made of rice starch, and (ii) a milk-protein concentrate without phospholipids that has been matched for protein content and total calories. The reason/rationale for including two comparator treatments (rather than one) is the opportunity to address separate research questions. The first comparison (to inert placebo) addresses the research question of whether Lacprodan® PL-20 as a whole has benefits for cognitive function and other secondary outcomes. The second comparison to a milk-protein concentrate without phospholipids addresses a more specific research question regarding whether benefits to cognition and other outcomes associated with Lacprodan® PL-20 can be attributed specifically to the phospholipid content in the formula. In consideration of previous research demonstrating cognitive benefits associated with dairy components other than phospholipids [3], the inclusion of a third treatment arm was deemed necessary in order to properly delineate the effects of phospholipids versus other dairy components present in Lacprodan® PL-20.

On the basis of previous human clinical studies with bovine and plant-derived phospholipids, it is hypothesised that in comparison to the inert placebo, Lacprodan® PL-20 supplementation over 180 days will result in significant improvements on our primary variable, namely a composite memory score computed from the Rey’s Verbal Learning Test (RVLT). We are also exploring the possibly that the treatment may benefit other elements of cognitive performance (including processing speed and global functioning). A second hypothesis is that cognitive benefits of a lesser magnitude will be observed when comparing supplementation with Lacprodan® PL-20 with milk protein concentrate (MPC) without phospholipids placebo over 180 days. Additionally we are exploring the effects of Lacprodan® PL-20 on a number of central, CV and GI biomarkers.

Study site

PLICAR will be conducted at the Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

Participants

A total of 150 healthy elderly participants (≥55 years) with AAMI will take part in the study. AAMI is defined on the basis of criteria first outlined by Crook et al. [63, 64]: (i) a score >25 on the Memory Complaint Questionnaire (MAC-Q [64]) and (ii) a score ≤1 standard deviation below the mean for healthy young adults on the paired associates test from the WMS-R [62]. Participants will be excluded from participation if they are currently diagnosed with dementia and/or score <24 on the MMSE [65]; have a neurological, cardiac, endocrine, GI or bleeding disorder; have a psychiatric illness, including moderate-to-severe depression, as defined as a score ≥20 on the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) [66]; have a current or previous history of alcoholism and/or substance abuse; have a known or suspected allergy to cow’s milk and/or lactose intolerance; are a current smoker, or are not fluent in the English language. To be eligible, participants also cannot be currently taking any medications or herbal/dietary supplements with known cognitive effects. The study is jointly funded by Arla Foods (Denmark) and Swinburne University of Technology. It was ethically approved by the Swinburne University Human Research Ethics Committee (project number 2012/294) and all participants will provide written informed consent. The trial has been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000347763).

Procedure

Eligible participants are required to attend four testing sessions. An overview of the testing sessions is provided in the clinical trial flow chart (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Phospholipid intervention for cognitive ageing reversal (PLICAR) protocol flow diagram. AAMI, age-associated memory impairment; MAC-Q, Memory Complaint Questionnaire; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory II; BMI, body mass index; RPM, Raven’s Progressive Matrices; APOE, Apoliprotein E; MTHFR, Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MEG, magnetoencephalography; MPC, milk protein concentrate; TICS-M telephone interview for cognitive status modified.

Visit 1 (screening/practice)

During the first visit, voluntary written informed consent is obtained from all participants. Then the participants are further screened for eligibility and administered the MMSE, MAC-Q, WMS-R and BDI-II. A detailed medical history is also taken, a dietary questionnaire is administered [67, 68] and demographic information is collected, which includes body mass index (BMI), age, educational background and general intelligence (as measured by RPM). All eligible participants are then required to complete practice versions of all the cognitive outcome measures to be used in the study.

Visit 2 (Baseline)

The second visit will be scheduled for one week following the screening/practice visit. In preparation for the baseline visit, all participants will be required to collect and store their faecal sample (as per the procedure provided in the faecal sample collection kit) a day before the actual visit. The faecal sample for GI microbiota analysis will be deposited at the Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, when the participant comes for the baseline visit. The faecal samples will be stored at -80°C until further analysis. Also in preparation, participants will be required to fast from 10 pm the night before. A fasting blood sample will then be taken in order to assess the baseline biochemical measures, together with a separate blood sample, which will be used for Apolipoprotein E (APOE) and Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductas e (MTHFR) genotyping. Following the blood samples, participants will eat a light breakfast. Half an hour after breakfast, participants will be required to complete all pre-dose cognitive, mood and CV measures. Participants will then be randomized to their treatment group (Lacprodan PL-20® or MPC or rice starch) and consume their first sachet of study treatment dissolved in water. A lunch break of 90 minutes will then follow, before post dose testing on all cognitive, mood and cardiovascular measures. At the conclusion of the baseline study visit, participants will be provided with enough study treatment for the next 90 days.

Visits 3 and 4 (90 and 180 days)

The schedule of events for the 90-day and 180-day visits is identical to that for the baseline visit. On the day of each study visit participants will be required to wait until the completion of pre-dose assessments before consuming their daily study treatment.

Neuroimaging sub-study

Participants involved in the neuroimaging sub-study will be required to attend two additional sessions, the first in the week preceding their baseline visit and the second in the week preceding their 180-day visit (see Figure 1). In the second visit they will be required to consume their study treatment as usual in the morning before the scans. This is due to the fact that the neuroimaging sub-study is only concerned with the chronic effects of PL-20 on brain function.

Sample size

Based on the reviewed literature, we predict a small-medium effect size (f = 0.14) on the primary variable. The sample size for this study is 150 participants, with 50 participants in each treatment group (Lacprodan® PL-20, MPC or rice starch). Allowing for a 20% drop-out rate over the course of the 180-day testing period, this will give 80% power to detect significant treatment × time interactions from baseline to 180 days for the primary outcome (calculated using G*Power 3.1, with α = 0.05 and r = 0.5 for the correlation between repeated measures).

Treatments

Lacprodan® PL-20, a powdered MPC rich in phospholipids, is manufactured by Arla Foods Ingredients Group P/S, Viby J, Denmark. The content of individual phospholipids in Lacprodan® PL-20 is displayed in Table 1.
Table 1

Phospholipid composition of Lacprodan® PL-20 by percentage and daily dose

 

Percentage (%)

Minimum dose per day

Sphingomyelin

4.3

688 mg

Phosphatidyl choline (PC)

4.3

688 mg

Phosphatidyl serine (PS)

1.9

304 mg

Phosphatidyl ethanolamine (PE)

3.5

560 mg

Phosphatidyl inositol (PI)

1.3

208 mg

Ganglioside and others

0.7

112 mg

Lacprodan® PL-20 will be administered orally at a maximum dose of 16 g/day, providing minimum daily dosages of 2.7 g PL and 300 mg PS. The powder is dissolved in 150 to 200 mL water and drunk once per day with breakfast. Two placebo treatments will also be administered: (i) an inert placebo consisting of rice starch (20 g/day), and (ii) an MPC without phospholipids (Arla Foods); (12 g/day). Both placebo treatments are also administered orally as powders dissolved in ≤250 mL water and matched to Lacprodan® PL-20 for colour and taste in order to ensure treatment blinding.

Randomization and safety

Randomization of participants to treatment groups will be determined by random allocation. For the neuroimaging sub-study 60 randomization numbers will be set aside, which correspond to 10 female participants receiving Lacprodan® PL-20, 10 receiving MPC and 10 receiving rice starch placebo, and 10 male participants receiving Lacprodan® PL-20, 10 receiving MPC and 10 receiving rice starch placebo. Blinding for both the main study as well as the neuroimaging sub-study will be conducted by an independent staff member at the Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, who is outside of the project, to code the treatments, and maintain the key to this code until data collection is completed. All potential adverse events will be monitored throughout the trial, with oversight from the Swinburne University of Technology Human Research Ethics committee.

Primary outcomes

The primary study outcome is the effect of Lacprodan® PL-20 supplementation on memory as measured using a compound score from the RVLT [69, 70], similar to that used previously [71]. The memory score will be derived using the formula:
Z 15 Word Learning test total immediate recall + Z 15 Word Learning Test maximum immediate recall + Z 15 Word Learning Test delayed recall / 3 .

The RVLT is a test of verbal learning and memory that has a long history of use both in the assessment of clinical memory disturbances as well as cognitive decline associated with normal ageing [70]. Verbal learning, as measured by the RVLT and similar tests, has previously been found to be sensitive to the effects of phospholipid interventions in AAMI populations [39, 41]. Similarly, verbal memory has also been found to be sensitive to other nutraceutical interventions such as Bacopa monnieri[72] and folic acid [71] in elderly populations. For these reasons, the inclusion of the RVLT will enable direct comparison of the efficacy of the milk-derived phospholipids present in Lacprodan® PL-20 to previous cognitive intervention studies in the elderly.

Secondary outcomes

A range of secondary outcomes will be used, encompassing cognitive performance, mood, CV, GI microbiota, biochemical, genetic and brain imaging modalities. Secondary outcomes will include other elements of cognitive performance as measured by a battery of well-validated and highly sensitive cognitive tests. Traditional paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests as well as computerized tasks have been included. These tests will be implemented at baseline, 90 days and 180 days (pre-dose) in order to capture chronic effects. This battery will consist of the MMSE [65], the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) [73], RVLT [69, 70], Spatial Working memory and Contextual Memory tasks from the Swinburne University Computerized Cognitive Ageing Battery (SUCCAB [74]), rapid visual information processing (RVIP), serial 3 s and 7 s subtraction and the Hick’s reaction time paradigm. In order to capture potential acute cognitive effects associated with Lacprodan® PL-20 supplementation, the SUCCAB tests, RVIP, serial 3 s and 7 s subtraction and Hick’s reaction time will also be administered 90 minutes post dose.

The MMSE [65] is a global measure of cognitive function that has been used extensively both as a diagnostic tool for dementia screening as well as a cognitive outcome measure for gauging the efficacy of chronic nutraceutical interventions in elderly participants, for example [71, 75, 76]. The MMSE was included in the current study due to its widespread use in previous research; however problems with ceiling effects and insensitivity to change amongst high-functioning individuals have been previously well-documented [77].

The PRMQ [73] is a self-report instrument which provides a measure of retrospective as well as prospective memory slips in everyday life. The PRMQ was included in the current study in order to provide an ecologically valid measure of typical memory complaints that may be of concern to elderly individuals. Although most memory complaint questionnaires focus exclusively on failures to remember previous information (retrospective memory), the PRMQ is unique in that it additionally provides a measure of prospective memory failures, which are failures relating to tasks that need to be completed at a certain time (for example, remembering to turn up to an appointment on time) [73, 78].

In addition to the use of traditional psychometric tests, the importance of including computerized tests that may accurately gauge the speed of well-differentiated cognitive functions has emerged in recent years [79]. In the current study the spatial working memory and contextual memory tasks from the SUCCAB have been included due to high degrees of sensitivity to the effects of ageing, as measured using response times [74]. Similarly, significant reductions in response times on both of these tasks have previously been reported in older participants following chronic nutraceutical interventions [80, 81]. For the assessment of processing speed, the highly sensitive Hick reaction time paradigm [82] will be used. For the assessment of cognitive function during increased demand, serial 3 s and serial 7 s subtraction will be assessed together with the RVIP computerized measure of sustained attention. Previous research from our laboratory has found the serial subtraction and RVIP tasks to be particularly sensitive to the acute effects of nutraceutical interventions [8386].

Mood

There is evidence to suggest that phospholipid supplementation may have a positive effect on chronic stress as well as mood. Mood improvements have been previously reported in a double-blind trial of PS in depressed patients [87]. A number of studies have also demonstrated that phospholipids may have anti-stress effects, as demonstrated by lowered levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), reduction in perceived stress ratings in response to acute stress [88] and reduced cortisol release in response to acute stress [89, 90]. In relation to milk-based phospholipids, it was recently demonstrated that chronic supplementation may lead to increased morning cortisol availability in chronically stressed men [91] as well as a blunting of self-report stress ratings in response to an acute stressor [43].

Chronic changes in mood over the course of the trial will be assessed using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) [92], the Profile of Mood States (POMS) [93] and Bond-Lader visual analogue mood scales [94]. These measures will be administered at baseline, 90 and 180 days pre-dose. The Bond-Lader scales will additionally be administered post dose at each study visit in order to capture potential acute mood effects associated with Lacprodan® PL-20 treatment. The Bond-Lader scales have previously been used by our group in a wide range of acute and chronic intervention studies, and have been found to display excellent sensitivity to subtle affective changes.

Cardiovascular assessment

There is evidence to suggest that increases in arterial stiffness with ageing, which are reflected in measures of blood flow velocity, may be a contributing factor in cognitive decline [95, 96]. Previous research suggests that milk proteins may increase insulin secretion, as well as help to reduce blood pressure and plasma cholesterol levels [3, 97]. Further, high levels of B12 present in milk may also help to lower HCy levels, which are a contributing factor to CV disease [98]. In light of the fact that Lacprodan® PL-20 is an MPC, it could be argued that chronic supplementation may have a positive influence on CV function. By this reasoning, the inclusion of CV parameters in the current study will enable exploration of whether improvements to CV function are a mechanism by which with Lacprodan® PL-20 may achieve cognitive benefits.

CV function will be assessed using brachial blood pressure, aortic blood pressure, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) as well as blood flow velocity in the medial carotid artery and the common carotid artery (CCA). Brachial blood pressure will be calculated with the participant seated and following a five-minute rest period using a clinically validated automated sphygmomanometer. Aortic blood pressure, pulse pressure and PWV (all aspects of arterial stiffness and CV pressures) will be measured non-invasively using the SphygmoCor device. Applanation tonometry of the radial artery will be used to estimate aortic pressures and wave reflections, and applanation of the carotid and femoral arteries will be used to measure PWV. A non-invasive transcranial Doppler system will be used to record middle cerebral artery (MCA) blood velocity by placing a sensor close to the participant’s ear and common carotid artery (CCA) blood velocity will be recorded by placing a hand-held sensor at the base of the participant’s neck. All CV measures will be assessed pre- and post dose at the baseline, 90-day and 180-day study visits in order to capture both acute and chronic effects associated with Lacprodan® PL-20 supplementation.

Gastrointestinal microbiota

In recent years research in the field of GI microbiota has caught major interest. Research is suggesting that modifications in the composition of the GI microbiota influence normal physiological functions and contribute to diseases ranging from inflammation to diabetes. Collectively studies now indicate that the gut microbiota also communicates with the CNS possibly through immune, neural and endocrine pathways, and by these means influences gut-brain communication, brain function and even behaviour [99101]. Studies on germ-free animals and animals exposed to pathogenic bacterial infections, probiotic bacteria or antibiotics, suggest a role of GI microbiota in the regulation of cognition, anxiety and mood [101103]. Moreover GI microbiota perform many important functions like protection, immune development and metabolism, which together have an enormous effect on host nutrition and health condition [104106]. Previous studies suggest that human and bovine milk proteins prevent the adhesion and colonisation of pathogenic bacteria in the GI tract [107109] and promote the growth of beneficial bacteria [110]. As knowing that GI microbiota have several physiological functions in the human health condition, it can be influenced by Lacprodan® PL-20 milk protein supplementation. Therefore, it will be valuable to study the GI microbiota at different time points across the clinical trial to identify the effect of Lacprodan® PL-20 on indigenes microbial community.

Faecal samples will be collected for the GI microbiota analysis at baseline, 90 days and 180 days to explore the possible effect of Lacprodan® PL-20 on the microbial composition. The microbiota analysis will be carried out by utilising deep next-generation shotgun sequencing [111] of DNA extracted from collected faecal samples. This analysis will provide insight into GI microbiota of the ageing population and also functional characterisation will provide understanding of the potential mechanism by which Lacprodan® PL-20 may influence age-related cognitive decline (ARCD).

Biochemical assessment

Haematological testing will be conducted at baseline, 90 days and 180 days in order to further investigate possible mechanisms by which Lacprodan® PL-20 may influence cognitive decline. These measures have been chosen on the basis of current aetiological understanding of brain ageing as well as proposed in vivo actions of Lacprodan® PL-20 constituents.

Previous research has demonstrated that administration of PC, a major phospholipid component of Lacprodan® PL-20, can increase the plasma choline as well as brain acetylcholine (Ach) supply [112, 113]. Further, elevated levels of the neurotoxic substance HCy have been found to be a risk factor for cognitive decline [48, 114116]. Improved HCy levels have been found to result from increased intake of PC and choline [52, 53]. Vitamin B12, which is present in high quantities in dairy products [117], has also been found to be effective in reducing HCy in elderly populations [118]. For these reasons plasma choline as well as B Vitamins and HCy levels will be monitored throughout the study.

Other major contributors to brain ageing are oxidative stress [119, 120] and inflammation [121]. The phospholipids PC and PS have both been found to display anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, inhibiting microglial activation as well as superoxide and nitric oxide production [122]. Endogenous antioxidant glutathione (GSH) is the most abundant antioxidant in human cells, which plays a central role in defence from oxidative stress [123]. Under normal physiological conditions the ratio of reduced GSH to oxidized glutathione (glutathione disulphide, GSSG) is as high as 100:1. However, in cases of increased oxidative stress the ratio changes due to increased levels of GSSG or decreased levels of reduced GSH. For this reason peripheral blood levels of GSH as well as the ratio of GSH/GSSG in the blood are good measures of oxidative stress, and have been found to be altered in patients with mild cognitive impairment and AD [124]. Another widely-used biomarker of oxidative stress is F2-isoprostane, which is an excellent in vivo measure of lipid peroxidation [125]. Peripheral blood plasma levels of F2 isoprostane have been found to be significantly elevated in mild cognitive impairment [126]. A previous study from our laboratory in elderly participants found plasma F2 isoprostane levels to significantly decline following a 3-month intervention with the antioxidant Pycnogenol [127]. In addition to these measures of oxidative stress, serum measures of inflammation will be provided using the following inflammatory biomarkers: TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP). Peripheral levels of these inflammatory biomarkers have previously been found to be elevated in cases of mild cognitive impairment and AD in comparison to healthy age-matched controls [128, 129].

Genetic

A separate blood sample will be collected pre-randomization for the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the APOE and the MTHFR genes. The APOE-ϵ4 allele has been found to be associated with an increased risk of developing AD as well as cognitive decline in normal elderly [130, 131]. Testing for allelic differences in the APOE gene was included in the current study in order to determine whether these genetic differences may affect the efficacy of Lacprodan® PL-20 as a treatment for AAMI. MTHR is an important enzyme involved in the metabolism of HCy. The MTHFR 677 T allele is associated with reduced enzymatic activity, which results in decreased serum and plasma levels of folate as well as increased plasma levels of HCy [132]. In consideration of the relationship between levels of phospholipids, vitamin B12 and HCy [53, 118], genetic testing for allelic differences in the MTHFR gene was included in the current study in order to assess whether this may also affect the efficacy of Lacprodan® PL-20 as an AAMI treatment.

Neuroimaging

Neuroimaging with fMRI and MEG will be conducted in a subset of 60 participants in order to further explore the in vivo mechanisms of action of Lacprodan® PL-20 in the brain. Previous neuroimaging studies using PS supplementation in AD have been conducted using electroencephalography (EEG) as well as positron emission tomography (PET) [133135]. PET results revealed that for the PS group there was increased glucose metabolism during a visual recognition task across a number of brain regions, most notably the temperoparietal regions [133]. However, to date no further neuroimaging studies have been conducted using phospholipid interventions, and to the best of our knowledge none have been conducted using MRI or MEG.

In the current study structural and functional MRI scans will be acquired using a Siemens 3 Tesla Tim Trio MRI scanner (Erlangen, Germany), located at the Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University of Technology. During the initial scan, a structural image will be obtained for each participant and used as a reference point for further functional scans. Scanning for DTI analysis, a measure of white matter integrity, will also be conducted. Following DTI there will be scanning in a resting state in order to assess activity in the default mode network (DMN) for approximately 6 minutes. Additional analysis of cell membrane fluidity will also be conducted by using the T2 signal timing information (relaxometry) while in a resting state. Changes in the blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) signal will also be analysed while participants complete in-scanner versions of verbal episodic memory (approximately 20 minutes) and N-Back working memory tasks (approximately 20 minutes).

MEG scanning will be conducted using an Elekta Neuromag® TRIUX 306-Channel Magnetometer system (Helsinki, Finland) MEG system, also located at the Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University of Technology. Initial scanning while in a resting state will be conducted in order to collect information as to activity in the DMN. Following this scanning will be conducted whilst participants complete the same in-scanner tasks as used in the fMRI task: verbal episodic memory and N-Back working memory. The two tasks are kept the same across both fMRI and MEG in order for information from the two imaging modalities to be combined into a single comprehensive analysis. MEG scanning provides important complementary information, which is additional to that provided by fMRI. The temporal resolution of MEG is far superior to fMRI; MEG is capable of recording neural oscillations from delta right through to the gamma range (>40 Hz). Although the spatial resolution of MEG is less than that of fMRI, the high number of sensors (approximately 300), together with modern source reconstruction algorithms (for example, beam forming) means that the spatial resolution of MEG is far superior to conventional scalp-recorded EEG [135]. The combination of the two imaging modalities is state-of-the-art and will provide an unparalleled level of analysis of the effects of Lacprodan® PL-20 on memory function.

All primary and secondary outcome measures are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2

Summary of PLICAR outcome measures by visit

 

Measures

V1

V2

V3

V4

Screening

Written informed consent

X

   
 

Demographics

X

   
 

Medical history

X

   
 

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

X

X

X

X

 

Concomitant medications

X

X

X

X

 

Adverse events

X

X

X

X

 

Dietary questionnaire

X

   

Cognitive

Memory Complaint Questionnaire (MAC-Q)

X

   
 

Wechsler Memory Scale Revised (WMS-R)

X

   
 

Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM)

X

   
 

Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE)

X

X

X

X

 

Rey Verbal Learning Test (RVLT)

X

X

X

X

 

SUCCAB Spatial Working Memory

X

X

X

X

 

SUCCAB Contextual Memory

X

X

X

X

 

Prospective and Retrospective Memory (PRMQ)

X

X

X

X

 

Rapid visual information processing (RVIP)

X

X

X

X

 

Serial 3 s and 7 s subtraction

X

X

X

X

 

Jensen box task

X

X

X

X

Mood

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)

X

   
 

Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS)

X

X

X

X

 

Profile of Mood States (POMS)

X

X

X

X

 

Bond-Lader visual analogue mood scales

X

X

X

X

Cardiovascular

Brachial blood pressure

 

X

X

X

 

SphygmoCor (Aortic blood pressure, pulse pressure, PWV)

 

X

X

X

 

Blood velocity (MCA and CCA)

 

X

X

X

GI microbiota

Intestinal bacteria

 

X

X

X

Biochemical

Oxidative stress (Glutathione and F2 isoprostanes)

 

X

X

X

 

Inflammation (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and CRP)

 

X

X

X

 

B Vitamins (B6, B9 and B12)

 

X

X

X

 

Homocysteine (HCy)

 

X

X

X

 

Glucoregulation

 

X

X

X

 

Serum choline

 

X

X

X

Genetic

Apolipoprotein E and MTHFR

 

X

  

Brain imaging

Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

 

X

 

X

 

Diffusion tensor imaging (MRI)

 

X

 

X

 

Default mode network activation (MEG and MRI)

 

X

 

X

 

Relaxometry (MRI)

 

X

 

X

 

Episodic Memory task (functional MRI and MEG)

 

X

 

X

 

N-Back working memory task (functional MRI and MEG)

 

X

 

X

V1, screening/practice session; V2, baseline visit; V3, 9-day visit; V4, 180-day visit; GI, gastrointestinal; SUCCAB, Spatial Working memory and Contextual Memory tasks from the Swinburne University Computerized Cognitive Ageing Battery; PWV, pulse wave velocity; MCA, medial carotid artery; CCA, common carotid artery; CRP, C-reactive protein; MTHFR, Methyltetrahydrofolate reductase; MEG, magnetoencephalography.

Analysis

The primary analysis will investigate the effect of treatment on all cognitive outcomes from baseline to 180 days, using the groups as randomized (intention to treat). Statistical analyses will be conducted using linear mixed modelling, whereby subject-specific random intercepts and slopes will be fitted to subject data and fixed effects will be fitted to treatment group, time and the treatment × time interaction. On the basis of APOE and MTHFR genotyping, subgroup analysis will also be conducted in order to investigate the effect of allelic differences on treatment response. Secondary outcome variables will be analysed using similar statistical techniques. Results will be considered statistically significant at an alpha level of P <0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons.

Although stratification according to age, intelligence and baseline WMS-R scores may help to explain some of the residual between-group variance unrelated to the treatment effect, further exploration of possible covariates will also be investigated. Baseline correlations between the primary cognitive outcome measures and other baseline variables, including BMI, educational background, diet, CV function, GI microbiota and biochemical parameters, will also be investigated in order to investigate other important covariates. In the event that significant correlations at the P <0.05 level are found at baseline then these additional variables will also be controlled for in the primary analysis of cognitive outcomes.

Analysis of functional neuroimaging data (both MEG and fMRI) during episodic memory and N-Back working memory tasks will be conducted using a region of interest (ROI) approach. Using this method, between-group (Lacprodan® PL-20 versus MPC and inert placebo) functional differences in predefined brain regions will be statistically analysed. The ROIs for the episodic memory task will include the medial temporal lobes, the lateral prefrontal cortices, the associative temporal and paretial regions, the cingulate gyrus and the cerebellum. The ROIs that will be analysed in the N-Back working memory task will include the dorsolateral, ventrolateral and medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, parietal cortex and sensorimotor cortex [136].

Trial status

The trial is currently recruiting.

Abbreviations

AAMI: 

Age-associated memory impairment

AD: 

Alzheimer’s disease

APOE: 

Apolipoprotein E

ARCD: 

Age-related cognitive decline

BDI-II: 

Beck depression inventory II

BMI: 

Body mass index

CCA: 

Common carotid artery

CNS: 

Central nervous system

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

V: 

Cardiovascular

DASS: 

Depression anxiety and stress scale

DNM: 

Default mode network

DTI: 

Diffusion tensor imaging

EEG: 

Electroencephalography

fMRI: 

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

GI: 

Gastrointestinal

GSH: 

Glutathione

GSSG: 

Glutathione disulphide

HCy: 

Homocysteine

L: 

Interleukin

MAC-Q: 

Memory complaint questionnaire

MCA: 

Middle cerebral artery

MEG: 

Magnetoencephalography

MPC: 

Milk protein concentrate

MTHFR: 

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase

MSE: 

Mini mental state Examination

PC: 

Phosphatidylcholine

PET: 

Positron emission tomography

PL: 

Phospholipid

PLICAR: 

Phospholipid intervention for cognitive ageing reversal

POMS: 

Profile of mood states

PRMQ: 

Prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire

PS: 

Phosphatidylserine

PWV: 

Pulse wave velocity

ROI: 

Region of interest

RPM: 

Raven’s progressive matrices

RVIP: 

Rapid visual information processing

RVLT: 

Rey’s verbal learning test

SB: 

Soybean

SUCCAB: 

Spatial working memory and contextual memory tasks from the Swinburne university computerized cognitive ageing battery

tHcy: 

Total homocysteine

TICS-M: 

Telephone interview for cognitive status – modified

TNF: 

Tumour necrosis factor

WMS-R: 

Wechlser memory scale-revised.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by Arla Foods, Denmark. Author PF is an employee of Arla Foods and contributed to the study design and to the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne 3122, Victoria, Australia
(2)
Brain & Psychological Sciences Research Centre, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
(3)
Arla Food Ingredients, P/S Sønderhøj 14, 8260 Viby J, Denmark

References

  1. Salthouse TA, Meinz EJ: Aging, inhibition, working memory, and speed. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1995, 50: 297-306.Google Scholar
  2. Reid LM, MacLullich AMJ: Subjective memory complaints and cognitive impairment in older people. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006, 22: 471-485. 10.1159/000096295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Camfield DA, Owen L, Scholey AB, Pipingas A, Stough C: Dairy constituents and neurocognitive health in ageing. Br J Nutr. 2011, 106: 159-174. 10.1017/S0007114511000158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Segura B, Jurado Luque MÁ: Metabolic syndrome and ageing: cognitive impairment and structural alterations of the central nervous system [article in Spanish]. Rev Neurol. 2009, 49: 417-424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Crichton GE, Bryan J, Buckley J, Murphy KJ: Dairy consumption and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review of findings and methodological issues. Obes Rev. 2011, 12: e190-e201. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00837.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crichton GE, Elias MF, Dore GA, Robbins MA: Relation between dairy food intake and cognitive function: the Maine-Syracuse longitudinal study. Int Dairy J. 2012, 22: 15-23. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2011.08.001.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kidd PM: Phosphatidylserine; membrane nutrient for memory. a clinical and mechanistic assessment. Altern Med Rev. 1996, 1: 70-84.Google Scholar
  8. Toffano G, Battistella A, Orlando P: Pharmacokinetics of radiolabelled brain phosphatidylserine. Clin Trials J. 1987, 24: 18-24.Google Scholar
  9. Salem N, Serpentino P, Puskin JS, Abood LG: Preparation and spectroscopic characterization of molecular species of brain phosphatidylserines. Chem Phys Lipids. 1980, 27: 289-304. 10.1016/0009-3084(80)90024-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pepeu G, Pepeu IM, Amaducci L: A review of phosphatidylserine pharmacological and clinical effects. Is phosphatidylserine a drug for the ageing brain?. Pharmacol Res. 1996, 33: 73-80. 10.1006/phrs.1996.0013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kidd PM: Alzheimer’s disease, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and age-associated memory impairment: current understanding and progress toward integrative prevention. Altern Med Rev. 2008, 13: 85-115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Osella MC, Re G, Badino P, Bergamasco L, Miolo A: Phosphatidylserine (PS) as a potential nutraceutical for canine brain aging: a review. J Vet Behav: Clin Appl Res. 2008, 3: 41-51. 10.1016/j.jveb.2007.08.003.Google Scholar
  13. Vannucchi MG, Casmenti F, Pepeu G: Decrease of acetylcholine release from cortical slices in aged rats: investigations into its reversal by phosphatidylserine. J Neurochem. 1990, 55: 819-825. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb04565.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vannucchi MG, Pepeu G: Effect of phosphatidylserine on acetylcholine release and content in cortical slices from aging rats. Neurobiol Aging. 1987, 8: 403-407. 10.1016/0197-4580(87)90034-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zanotti A, Valzelli L, Toffano G: Chronic phosphatidylserine treatment improves spatial memory and passive avoidance in aged rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989, 99: 316-321. 10.1007/BF00445550.Google Scholar
  16. Argentiero V, Tavolato B: Dopamine (DA) and serotonin metabolic levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in Alzheimer’s presenile dementia under basic conditions and after stimulation with cerebral cortex phospholipids (BC-PL). J Neurol. 1980, 224: 53-58. 10.1007/BF00313207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruni A, Toffano G, Leon A, Boarato E: Pharmacological effects of phosphatidylserine liposomes. Nature. 1976, 260: 331-333. 10.1038/260331a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Milan F, Guidolin D, Polato P: Structural changes of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in the aged rat. Effect of phosphatidylserine administration. New Trends in Aging Research. Edited by: Pepeu G, Tomlinson B, Wischik CM. 1988, Padova, Italy: Liviana Press, 221-231.Google Scholar
  19. Gelbmann CM, Muller WE: Chronic treatment with phosphatidylserine restores muscarinic cholinergic receptor deficits in the aged mouse brain. Neurobiol Aging. 1992, 13: 45-50. 10.1016/0197-4580(92)90007-K.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nunzi MG, Milan F, Guidolin D, Polato P, Toffano G: Effects of phosphatidylserine administration on age-related structural changes in the rat hippocampus and septal complex. Pharmacopsychiatry, Suppl. 1989, 22: 125-128. 10.1055/s-2007-1014632.Google Scholar
  21. Nunzi MG, Guidolin D, Petrelli L, Polato P, Zanotti A: Behavioral and morpho-functional correlates of brain aging: a preclinical study with phosphatidylserine. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1992, 318: 393-398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Suzuki S, Furushiro M, Takahashi M, Sakai M, Kudo S: Oral administration of soybean lecithin transphosphatidylated phosphatidylserine (SB-tPS) reduces ischemic damage in the gerbil hippocampus. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1999, 81: 237-239. 10.1254/jjp.81.237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Calderini G, Aporti F, Bonetti AC: Pharmacological effect of phosphatidylserine on age-dependent memory dysfunction. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1985, 444: 504-506. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb37626.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hashioka S, Han YH, Fujii S, Kato T, Monji A, Utsumi H, Sawada M, Nakanishi H, Kanba S: Phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylcholine-containing liposomes inhibit amyloid Beta and interferon-gamma-induced microglial activation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007, 42: 945-954. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.12.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Suzuki S, Yamatoya H, Sakai M, Kataoka A, Furushiro M, Kudo S: Oral administration of soybean lecithin transphosphatidylated phosphatidylserine improves memory impairment in aged rats. J Nutr. 2001, 131: 2951-2956.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Valzelli L, Kozak W, Zanotti A, Toffano G: Activity of phosphatidylserine on memory retrieval and on exploration in mice. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1987, 9: 657-660.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zanotti A, Aporti F, Toffano G, Valzelli L: Effects of phosphatidylserine on avoidance relearning in rats (preliminary observations). Pharmacol Res Commun. 1984, 16: 485-493. 10.1016/S0031-6989(84)80017-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Claro FT, Patti CL, Abilio VC, Frussa-Filho R, Silva RH: Bovine brain phosphatidylserine attenuates scopolamine induced amnesia in mice. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006, 30: 881-886. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.01.013.Google Scholar
  29. Furushiro M, Suzuki S, Shishido Y, Sakai M, Yamatoya H, Kudo S, Hashimoto S, Yokokura T: Effects of oral administration of soybean lecithin transphosphatidylated phosphatidylserine on impaired learning of passive avoidance in mice. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1997, 75: 447-450. 10.1254/jjp.75.447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zanotti A, Valzelli L, Toffano G: Reversal of scopolamine-induced amnesia by phosphatidylserine in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986, 90: 274-275.Google Scholar
  31. Vaisman N, Pelled D: n - 3 phosphatidylserine attenuated scopolamine-induced amnesia in middle-aged rats. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009, 33: 952-959. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.04.021.Google Scholar
  32. Alves CSD, Andreatini R, da Cunha C, Tufik S, Vital MABF: Phosphatidylserine reverses reserpine-induced amnesia. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000, 404: 161-167. 10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00607-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Amaducci L, Group S: Phosphatidylserine in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: results of a multicenter study. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988, 24: 130-134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Crook T, Petrie W, Wells C, Massari DC: Effects of phosphatidylserine in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1992, 28: 61-66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Delwaide PJ, Gyselynck-Mambourg AM, Hurlet A, Ylieff M: Double-blind randomized controlled study of phosphatidylserine in senile demented patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 1986, 73: 136-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Engel RR, Satzger W, Günther W, Kathmann N, Bove D, Gerke S, Münch U, Hippius H: Double-blind cross-over study of phosphatidylserine vs. placebo in patients with early dementia of the Alzheimer type. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1992, 2: 149-155. 10.1016/0924-977X(92)90025-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cenacchi T, Bertoldin T, Farina C, Fiori MG, Crepaldi G: Cognitive decline in the elderly: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study on efficacy of phosphatidylserine administration. Aging Clin Exp Res. 1993, 5: 123-133. 10.1007/BF03324139.Google Scholar
  38. Crook TH, Tinklenberg J, Yesavage J, Petrie W, Nunzi MG, Massari DC: Effects of phosphatidylserine in age-associated memory impairment. Neurology. 1991, 41: 644-649. 10.1212/WNL.41.5.644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Villardita C, Grioli S, Salmeri G: Multicentre clinical trial of brain phosphatidylserine in elderly patients with intellectual deterioration. Clin Trials J. 1987, 24: 84-93.Google Scholar
  40. Jorissen BL, Brouns F, van Boxtel MPJ, Ponds RWHM, Verhey FRJ, Jolles J, Riedel WJ: The influence of soy-derived phosphatidylserine on cognition in age-associated memory impairment. Nutr Neurosci. 2001, 4: 121-134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Vakhapova V, Cohen T, Richter Y, Herzog Y, Korczyn AD: Phosphatidylserine containing ω-3 fatty acids may improve memory abilities in non-demented elderly with memory complaints: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010, 29: 467-474. 10.1159/000310330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kato-Kataoka A, Sakai M, Ebina R, Nonaka C, Asano T, Miyamori T: Soybean-derived phosphatidylserine improves memory function of the elderly Japanese subjects with memory complaints. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2010, 47: 246-255. 10.3164/jcbn.10-62.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Hellhammer J, Waladkhani AR, Hero T, Buss C: Effects of milk phospholipid on memory and psychological stress response. Br Food J. 2010, 112: 1124-1137. 10.1108/00070701011080258.Google Scholar
  44. McDaniel MA, Maier SF, Einstein GO: “Brain-specific” nutrients: a memory cure?. Nutrition. 2003, 19: 957-975. 10.1016/S0899-9007(03)00024-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Zeisel SH, da Costa KA, Franklin PD, Alexander EA, Lamont JT, Sheard NF, Beiser A: Choline, an essential nutrient for humans. FASEB J. 1991, 5: 2093-2098.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Nagata T, Yaguchi T, Nishizaki T: DL- and PO-phosphatidylcholines as a promising learning and memory enhancer. Lipids Health Dis. 2011, 10: 25-10.1186/1476-511X-10-25.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Ladd SL, Sommer SA, LaBerge S, Toscano W: Effect of phosphatidylcholine on explicit memory. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1993, 16: 540-549. 10.1097/00002826-199312000-00007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Elias MF, Robbins MA, Budge MM, Elias PK, Brennan SL, Johnston C, Nagy Z, Bates CJ: Homocysteine, folate, and vitamins B6 and B12 blood levels in relation to cognitive performance: The Maine-Syracuse study. Psychosom Med. 2006, 68: 547-554. 10.1097/01.psy.0000221380.92521.51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Troen AM, Chao WH, Crivello NA, D’Anci KE, Shukitt-Hale B, Smith DE, Selhub J, Rosenberg IH: Cognitive impairment in folate-deficient rats corresponds to depleted brain phosphatidylcholine and is prevented by dietary methionine without lowering plasma homocysteine. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 2502-2509. 10.3945/jn.108.093641.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Ahmed T, Haboubi N: Assessment and management of nutrition in older people and its importance to health. Clin Interv Aging. 2010, 5: 207-216.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Haan MN, Miller JW, Aiello AE, Whitmer RA, Jagust WJ, Mungas DM, Allen LH, Green R: Homocysteine, B vitamins, and the incidence of dementia and cognitive impairment: results from the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 85: 511-517.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Chiuve SE, Giovannucci EL, Hankinson SE, Zeisel SH, Dougherty LW, Willett WC, Rimm EB: The association between betaine and choline intakes and the plasma concentrations of homocysteine in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86: 1073-1081.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Olthof MR, Brink EJ, Katan MB, Verhoef P: Choline supplemented as phosphatidylcholine decreases fasting and postmethionine-loading plasma homocysteine concentrations in healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 82: 111-117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Svennerholm L, Boström K, Jungbjer B, Olsson L: Membrane lipids of adult human brain: lipid composition of frontal and temporal lobe in subjects of age 20 to 100 years. J Neurochem. 1994, 63: 1802-1811.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Lim ST, Esfahani K, Avdoshina V, Mocchetti I: Exogenous gangliosides increase the release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Neuropharmacology. 2011, 60: 1160-1167. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.10.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Glorioso C, Sibille E: Between destiny and disease: genetics and molecular pathways of human central nervous system aging. Prog Neurobiol. 2011, 93: 165-181. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.11.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Fong TG, Neff NH, Hadjiconstantinou M: GM1 ganglioside improves spatial learning and memory of aged rats. Behav Brain Res. 1997, 85: 203-211. 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)87584-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Park EJ, Suh M, Ramanujam K, Steiner K, Begg D, Clandinin MT: Diet-induced changes in membrane gangliosides in rat intestinal mucosa, plasma and brain. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005, 40: 487-495. 10.1097/01.MPG.0000157199.25923.64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lu PH, Lee GJ, Raven EP, Tingus K, Khoo T, Thompson PM, Bartzokis G: Age-related slowing in cognitive processing speed is associated with myelin integrity in a very healthy elderly sample. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011, 33: 1059-1068. 10.1080/13803395.2011.595397.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Oshida K, Shimizu T, Takase M, Tamura Y, Yamashiro Y: Effects of dietary sphingomyelin on central nervous system myelination in developing rats. Pediatr Res. 2003, 53: 589-593. 10.1203/01.PDR.0000054654.73826.AC.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH: Standard progressive matrices. 2000, Oxford: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Wechsler D: Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised. 1987, Sidcup, UK: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  63. Crook T, Bartus RT, Ferris SH, Whitehouse P, Cohen GD, Gershon S: Age-associated memory impairment: proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change. Dev Neuropsychol. 1986, 2: 261-276. 10.1080/87565648609540348.Google Scholar
  64. Crook TH, Feher EP, Larrabee GJ: Assessment of memory complaint in age-associated memory impairment: the MAC-Q. Int Psychogeriatr. 1992, 4: 165-176. 10.1017/S1041610292000991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK: Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. 1996, San Antonio, TX: Psychological CorporationGoogle Scholar
  67. Hodge A, Patterson AJ, Brown WJ, Ireland P, Giles G: The Anti Cancer Council of Victoria FFQ: relative validity of nutrient intakes compared with weighed food records in young to middle-aged women in a study of iron supplementation. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2000, 24: 574-583.Google Scholar
  68. Giles C, Ireland P: Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies (Version 2). 1996, Cancer Council Victoria: MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  69. Rey A: L’examin clinique en psychologie. 1958, Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar
  70. van der Elst W, van Boxtel MPJ, van Breukelen GJP, Jolles J: Rey’s verbal learning test: normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24–81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005, 11: 290-302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Durga J, van Boxtel MP, Schouten EG, Kok FJ, Jolles J, Katan MB, Verhoef P: Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2007, 369: 208-216. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60109-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Calabrese C, Gregory WL, Leo M, Kraemer D, Bone K, Oken B: Effects of a standardized Bacopa monnieri extract on cognitive performance, anxiety, and depression in the elderly: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2008, 14: 707-713. 10.1089/acm.2008.0018.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Crawford JR, Smith G, Maylor EA, Della Sala S, Logie RH: The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory. 2003, 11: 261-275. 10.1080/09658210244000027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Pipingas A, Harris E, Tournier E, King R, Kras M, Stough CK: Assessing the efficacy of nutraceutical interventions on cognitive functioning in the elderly. Curr Top Nutraceutical Res. 2010, 8: 79-87.Google Scholar
  75. Gao Q, Niti M, Feng L, Yap KB, Ng TP: Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements and cognitive decline: Singapore longitudinal aging studies. J Nutr, Health and Aging. 2011, 15: 32-35. 10.1007/s12603-011-0010-z.Google Scholar
  76. Amieva H, Meillon C, Helmer C, Barberger-Gateau P, Dartigues JF: Ginkgo biloba extract and long-term cognitive decline: a 20-year follow-up population-based study. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8: e52755-10.1371/journal.pone.0052755.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Mungas D, Reed BR, Kramer JH: Psychometrically matched measures of global cognition, memory, and executive function for assessment of cognitive decline in older persons. Neuropsychology. 2003, 17: 380-392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith G, Della Sala S, Logie RH, Maylor EA: Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: a questionnaire study. Memory. 2000, 8: 311-321. 10.1080/09658210050117735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Wesnes KA, Bullock R: The emerging importance of attention and the speed of cognitive function in ageing and dementia research. CPD Bulletin Old Age Psychiatry. 2001, 3: 11-15.Google Scholar
  80. Harris E, MacPherson H, Vitetta L, Kirk J, Sali A, Pipingas A: Effects of a multivitamin, mineral and herbal supplement on cognition and blood biomarkers in older men: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012, 27: 370-377. 10.1002/hup.2236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Pipingas A, Silberstein RB, Vitetta L, van Rooy C, Harris EV, Young JM, Frampton CM, Sali A, Nastasi J: Improved cognitive performance after dietary supplementation with a Pinus radiata bark extract formulation. Phytother Res. 2008, 22: 1168-1174. 10.1002/ptr.2388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Jensen AR: The theory of intelligence and its measurement. Intelligence. 2011, 39: 171-177. 10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.004.Google Scholar
  83. Scholey AB, Kennedy DO: Acute, dose-dependent cognitive effects of Ginkgo biloba, Panax ginseng and their combination in healthy young volunteers: differential interactions with cognitive demand. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2002, 17: 35-44. 10.1002/hup.352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Scholey AB, French SJ, Morris PJ, Kennedy DO, Milne AL, Haskell CF: Consumption of cocoa flavanols results in acute improvements in mood and cognitive performance during sustained mental effort. J Psychopharmacol. 2010, 24: 1505-1514. 10.1177/0269881109106923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Kennedy DO, Haskell CF, Mauri PL, Scholey AB: Acute cognitive effects of standardised Ginkgo biloba extract complexed with phosphatidylserine. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2007, 22: 199-210. 10.1002/hup.837.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Reay JL, Kennedy DO, Scholey AB: Single doses of Panax ginseng (G115) reduce blood glucose levels and improve cognitive performance during sustained mental activity. J Psychopharmacol. 2005, 19: 357-365. 10.1177/0269881105053286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Maggioni M, Picotti GB, Bondiolotti GP, Panerai A, Cenacchi T, Nobile P, Brambilla F: Effects of phosphatidylserine therapy in geriatric patients with depressive disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1990, 81: 265-270. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb06494.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Benton D, Donohoe RT, Sillance B, Nabb S: The influence of phosphatidylserine supplementation on mood and heart rate when faced with an acute stressor. Nutr Neurosci. 2001, 4: 169-178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Monteleone P, Maj M, Beinat L, Natale M, Kemali D: Blunting by chronic phosphatidylserine administration of the stress-induced activation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in healthy men. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992, 42: 385-388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Hellhammer J, Fries E, Buss C, Engert V, Tuch A, Rutenberg D, Hellhammer D: Effects of soy lecithin phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylserine complex (PAS) on the endocrine and psychological responses to mental stress. Stress. 2004, 7: 119-126. 10.1080/10253890410001728379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Schubert M, Contreras C, Franz N, Hellhammer J: Milk-based phospholipids increase morning cortisol availability and improve memory in chronically stressed men. Nutr Res. 2011, 31: 413-420. 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.05.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH: The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995, 33: 335-343. 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF: Profile of mood states. 1992, Educational and Industrial Testing Service: San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  94. Bond A, Lader M: The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Psychol. 1974, 47: 211-218.Google Scholar
  95. Pase MP, Herbert A, Grima NA, Pipingas A, O’Rourke MF: Arterial stiffness as a cause of cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intern Med J. 2012, 42: 808-815. 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02645.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Pase MP, Pipingas A, Kras M, Nolidin K, Gibbs AL, Wesnes KA, Scholey AB, Stough C: Healthy middle-aged individuals are vulnerable to cognitive deficits as a result of increased arterial stiffness. J Hypertens. 2010, 28: 1724-1729. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833b1ee7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Crichton GE, Howe PRC, Buckley JD, Coates AM, Murphy KJ: Dairy consumption and cardiometabolic health: outcomes of a 12-month crossover trial. Nutr Metab. 2012, 9: 34-40. 10.1186/1743-7075-9-34.Google Scholar
  98. Refsum H, Ueland PM, Nygård O, Vollset SE: Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease. Ann Rev Med. 1998, 49: 31-62. 10.1146/annurev.med.49.1.31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Antunes LCM, Finlay BB: Gut Microbiota in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2010, 90: 859-904. 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Clemente Jose C, Ursell Luke K, Parfrey Laura W, Knight R: The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012, 148: 1258-1270. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Heijtz RD, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Björkholm B, Samuelsson A, Hibberd ML, Forssberg H, Pettersson S: Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011, 108: 3047-3052. 10.1073/pnas.1010529108.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu X-N, Kubo C, Koga Y: Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004, 558: 263-275. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Cryan JF, O’Mahony SM: The microbiome-gut-brain axis: from bowel to behavior. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011, 23: 187-192. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01664.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT: Role of intestinal bacteria in nutrient metabolism. Clin Nutr. 1997, 16: 3-11.Google Scholar
  105. Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Stepankova R, Hudcovic T, Tuckova L, Cukrowska B, Lodinova-Zadnikova R, Kozakova H, Rossmann P, Bartova J, Sokol D, Funda DP, Borovská D, Řeháková Z, Šinkora J, Hofman J, Drastich P, Kokešová A: Commensal bacteria (normal microflora), mucosal immunity and chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Immunol Lett. 2004, 93: 97-108. 10.1016/j.imlet.2004.02.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Wickens K, Black PN, Stanley TV, Mitchell E, Fitzharris P, Tannock GW, Purdie G, Crane J: A differential effect of 2 probiotics in the prevention of eczema and atopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008, 122: 788-794. 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.07.011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Hancock JT, Salisbury V, Ovejero-Boglione MC, Cherry R, Hoare C, Eisenthal R, Harrison R: Antimicrobial properties of milk: dependence on presence of xanthine oxidase and nitrite. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46: 3308-3310. 10.1128/AAC.46.10.3308-3310.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  108. Parker P, Sando L, Pearson R, Kongsuwan K, Tellam R, Smith S: Bovine Muc1 inhibits binding of enteric bacteria to Caco-2 cells. Glycoconj J. 2010, 27: 89-97. 10.1007/s10719-009-9269-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Matsumoto M, Hara K, Kimata H, Benno Y, Shimamoto C: Exfoliation of Helicobacter pylori from Gastric Mucin by Glycopolypeptides from Buttermilk. J Dairy Sci. 2005, 88: 49-54. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72661-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Bode L: Human milk oligosaccharides: prebiotics and beyond. Nutr Rev. 2009, 67: S183-S191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S, Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D, Peng Y, Zhang D, Jie Z, Wu W, Qin Y, Xue W, Li J, Han L, Lu D, Wu P, Dai Y, Sun X, Li Z, Tang A, Zhong S, Li X, Chen W, Wu R, Wang M, Feng Q: A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012, 490: 55-60. 10.1038/nature11450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Chung SY, Moriyama T, Uezu E, Uezu K, Hirata R, Yohena N, Masuda Y, Kokubu T, Yamamoto S: Administration of phosphatidylcholine increases brain acetylcholine concentration and improves memory in mice with dementia. J Nutr. 1995, 125: 1484-1489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Lee HC, Fellenz-Maloney MP, Liscovitch M, Blusztajn JK: Phospholipase D-catalyzed hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine provides the choline precursor for acetylcholine synthesis in a human neuronal cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 10086-10090. 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10086.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  114. Miller AL: The methionine-homocysteine cycle and its effects on cognitive diseases. Altern Med Rev. 2003, 8: 7-19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Mattson MP, Shea TB: Folate and homocysteine metabolism in neural plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2003, 26: 137-146. 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00032-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Elias MF, Sullivan LM, D’Agostino RB, Elias PK, Jacques PF, Selhub J, Seshadri S, Au R, Beiser A, Wolf PA: Homocysteine and cognitive performance in the Framingham Offspring Study: age is important. Am J Epidemiol. 2005, 162: 644-653. 10.1093/aje/kwi259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. US Department of Agriculture: USDA Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 16. 2003, Washington DC: Nutrient Data Laboratory Home PageGoogle Scholar
  118. de Jager CA, Oulhaj A, Jacoby R, Refsum H, Smith AD: Cognitive and clinical outcomes of homocysteine-lowering B-vitamin treatment in mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012, 27: 592-600. 10.1002/gps.2758.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Halliwell B: Reactive oxygen species and the central nervous system. J Neurochem. 1992, 59: 1609-1623. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10990.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Gracy RW, Talent JM, Kong Y, Conrad CC: Reactive oxygen species: the unavoidable environmental insult?. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen. 1999, 428: 17-22. 10.1016/S1383-5742(99)00027-7.Google Scholar
  121. Sarkar D, Fisher PB: Molecular mechanisms of aging-associated inflammation. Cancer Lett. 2006, 236: 13-23. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.04.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Townsend DM, Tew KD, Tapiero H: The importance of glutathione in human disease. Biomed Pharmacother. 2003, 57: 145-155. 10.1016/S0753-3322(03)00043-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Bermejo P, Martín-Aragón S, Benedí J, Susín C, Felici E, Gil P, Ribera JM, Villar AM: Peripheral levels of glutathione and protein oxidation as markers in the development of Alzheimer’s disease from Mild Cognitive Impairment. Free Radic Res. 2008, 42: 162-170. 10.1080/10715760701861373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Mariani E, Polidori MC, Cherubini A, Mecocci P: Oxidative stress in brain aging, neurodegenerative and vascular diseases: an overview. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005, 827: 65-75. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.04.023.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Praticò D, Clark CM, Liun F, Lee VYM, Trojanowski JQ: Increase of brain oxidative stress in mild cognitive impairment: a possible predictor of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2002, 59: 972-976. 10.1001/archneur.59.6.972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Ryan J, Croft K, Mori T, Wesnes K, Spong J, Downey L, Kure C, Lloyd J, Stough C: An examination of the effects of the antioxidant Pycnogenol® on cognitive performance, serum lipid profile, endocrinological and oxidative stress biomarkers in an elderly population. J Psychopharmacol. 2008, 22: 553-562. 10.1177/0269881108091584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Guerreiro RJ, Santana I, Brás JM, Santiago B, Paiva A, Oliveira C: Peripheral inflammatory cytokines as biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurodegener Dis. 2007, 4: 406-412. 10.1159/000107700.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Swardfager W, Lanctt K, Rothenburg L, Wong A, Cappell J, Herrmann N: A meta-analysis of cytokines in Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2010, 68: 930-941. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel D, Pericak-Vance MA, Joo SH, Rosi BL, Gusella JF, Crapper-MacLachlan DR, Alberts MJ, Hulette C, Crain B, Goldgaber D, Roses AD, St. George-Hyslop PH: Association of apolipoprotein E allele ϵ4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1993, 43: 1467-1472. 10.1212/WNL.43.8.1467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Dik MG, Jonker C, Comijs HC, Bouter LM, Twisk JWR, van Kamp GJ, Deeg DJH: Memory complaints and APOE-ϵ4 accelerate cognitive decline in cognitively normal elderly. Neurology. 2001, 57: 2217-2222. 10.1212/WNL.57.12.2217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Brustolin S, Giugliani R, Félix TM: Genetics of homocysteine metabolism and associated disorders. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010, 43: 1-7. 10.1590/S0100-879X2009007500021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Heiss WD, Kessler J, Slansky I, Mielke R, Szelies B, Herholz K: Activation PET as an instrument to determine therapeutic efficacy in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1993, 695: 327-331. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb23078.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Klinkhammer P, Szelies B, Heiss WD: Effect of phosphatidylserine on cerebral glucose metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia. 1990, 1: 197-201.Google Scholar
  134. Heiss WD, Kessler J, Mielke R, Szelies B, Herholz K: Long-term effects of phosphatidylserine, pyritinol, and cognitive training in Alzheimer’s disease. A neuropsychological, EEG, and PET investigation. Dementia. 1994, 5: 88-98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Brookes MJ, Wood JR, Stevenson CM, Zumer JM, White TP, Liddle PF, Morris PG: Changes in brain network activity during working memory tasks: a magnetoencephalography study. Neuroimage. 2011, 55: 1804-1815. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.074.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Cabeza R, Nyberg L: Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000, 12: 1-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Scholey et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement