Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

An explanatory randomised placebo controlled trial of levothyroxine supplementation for babies born <28 weeks’ gestation: results of the TIPIT trial

  • Sze M Ng1, 9Email author,
  • Mark A Turner1,
  • Carrol Gamble2,
  • Mohammed Didi3,
  • Suresh Victor4,
  • Donal Manning5,
  • Paul Settle6,
  • Richa Gupta7,
  • Paul Newland8 and
  • Alan Michael Weindling1
Trials201314:211

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-211

Received: 25 January 2013

Accepted: 2 July 2013

Published: 11 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Babies born before 28 weeks’ gestation have lower plasma thyroid hormone concentrations than more mature infants. This may contribute to their risk of poor developmental outcome. Previous studies have suggested that thyroxine supplementation for extremely preterm neonates may be beneficial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of administration of supplemental thyroxine to very premature babies on brain size and somatic growth at 36 weeks’ corrected gestational age (CGA).

Methods

In this explanatory multicentre double blind randomised placebo controlled trial, 153 infants born below 28 weeks’ gestation were randomised to levothyroxine (LT4) supplementation or placebo until 32 weeks’ CGA. The primary outcome was brain size assessed by the width of the subarachnoid space measured by cranial ultrasound at 36 weeks’ CGA. Lower leg length was measured by knemometry.

Results

Babies in the LT4-supplemented and placebo groups had similar baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences between infants given LT4 (n=78) or placebo (n=75) for width of the subarachnoid space, head circumference at 36 weeks’ CGA, body weight at 36 weeks’ CGA or mortality. Infants who received LT4 had significantly shorter leg lengths at 36 weeks’ CGA although adjusted analysis for baseline length did not find a statistical difference. There was a significant correlation between low FT4 and wider subarachnoid space. No unexpected serious adverse events were noted and incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

This is the only randomised controlled trial of thyroxine supplementation targeting extremely premature infants. Supplementing all babies below 28 weeks’ gestation with LT4 had no apparent effect on brain size. These results do not support routine supplementation with LT4 for all babies born below 28 weeks’ gestation.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN89493983

EUDRACT number: 2005-003-09939

Keywords

Thyroxine supplementation RCT Extreme preterm Brain Growth

Background

Hypothyroidism causes neurodevelopmental disability in untreated congenital hypothyroidism babies [1, 2] and this is preventable by supplementary levothyroxine (LT4) [3]. The proportion of preterm infants with low plasma free thyroxine (FT4) concentrations increases with decreasing gestational age [4, 5]. Up to 69% of infants born below 30 weeks’ gestation have lower thyroxine (FT4) concentrations than term babies [59]. However, LT4 supplementation does not invariably improve neurodevelopmental outcome [6, 1014]. It is unclear whether the condition known as transient hypothyroxinaemia of prematurity (THOP) [15], defined by low FT4 concentrations and normal concentrations of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), contributes to the causation of neurodisability. A Cochrane review [16] of thyroid hormone supplementation for premature infants concluded that future trials of sufficient size are needed to detect clinically important differences in neurodevelopmental outcome. The studies should enrol those infants most likely to benefit from thyroid hormone therapy such as extremely preterm infants. There is therefore clinical uncertainty about whether apparently low plasma FT4 concentrations should be treated or whether they are a marker of illness severity or a normal concomitant of prematurity.

The largest study to date has been a randomised controlled trial of levothyroxine (LT4) supplementation by van Wassenaer et al.[8, 14] that recruited 200 infants on the basis of gestational age (<30 weeks’ gestation). There were no differences in outcomes for the whole sample. However, a post hoc analysis of only 46 infants <27 weeks’ gestation (19 treated with LT4, 27 with placebo) showed an improved Bayley Scales II Mental Development Index (MDI; effect size 0.74 of SD) at 2 years. An improved IQ score (effect size 0.65 of SD) at age 5 years [17] was observed among the most immature infants treated with thyroxine. The reliability of that observation was limited by the small number of infants in the subgroup analysis, which had not been pre-specified. In other studies with between 31 and 49 participants, thyroid hormone supplementation for preterm infants under 32 weeks’ gestation had either beneficial or no apparent effects [6, 8, 13, 18, 19]. If the effect seen in the post hoc analysis by van Wassenaer et al.[14] was confirmed in larger studies, LT4 supplementation would give a clinically relevant improvement to clinical outcome. Accordingly, it is essential to examine whether this effect could be reproduced in a larger sample. We chose to power the study by a surrogate outcome in order to determine whether future studies powered on neurodevelopmental outcomes are warranted.

This study was designed as an explanatory trial [20] aimed at determining whether supplementation with LT4 postnatally until 32 weeks’ corrected gestational age (CGA) affects brain growth, somatic growth, the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. T4-supplementation was continued until 32 weeks’ CGA because there is epidemiological evidence from neurodevelopmental data acquired in the UK and Bavaria, Germany, that development from 32 weeks post conception until term-equivalence is fairly constant, whereas at lower gestations there is a loss of around 5 IQ points for each week of gestation [21]. Thus, infants below 32 weeks gestation appear to be particularly vulnerable to neurodevelopmental impairment and therefore most likely to benefit from any intervention. Transient hypothyroxinaemia was chosen because there are data to suggest that this intervention may be useful and the choice of LT4 supplementation and its dose was based on the previous study of van Wassenaer et al. [14].

Methods

This was a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, explanatory trial of postnatal LT4 supplementation given until 32 weeks’ CGA (that is, gestation plus postnatal age) to infants born below 28 weeks’ gestation. The protocol has been published [22].

Subjects

Multiple births were included with both babies randomized to the same arm. The following were excluded: infants born to mothers with known thyroid disease, on antithyroid medications or amiodarone; infants with major congenital or chromosomal abnormalities known to affect thyroid function or brain development; infants whose mothers died within 5 days of giving birth.

Intervention

Two forms of the active medication with corresponding placebos were used: intravenous LT4 (Levothyroid, Aventis Pharma, Spain, Marketing Authorization 971622) and oral LT4 solution (Evotrox, Kappin Ltd, London, Marketing Authorization PL20249/0007). The LT4-supplemention regime used the same dosage regimen as previous studies [14, 23], that is 8 μg/kg birthweight/day as a single daily dose. Either intravenous LT4 or placebo (5% dextrose) was started during the first 5 days after birth. Once enteral feeds were fully established, the oral solution Evotrox or placebo (carrier solution without active drug) were given daily until 32 weeks’ CGA.

Randomisation

Randomisation codes were computer generated using STATA with random variable block sizes of two and four, stratified by centre and gestation at birth (< 25 weeks’ gestation, 25-26+6 weeks’ gestation, 27-27+6 weeks’ gestation). Allocation concealment was done by the pharmacy departments of participating hospitals. Parents, care providers and outcome assessors were unaware of treatment allocation. Twin births followed the randomisation process as per singleton births such that siblings would receive the same allocation.

Imaging

Cranial ultrasound scans were performed by a single observer at 36 weeks’ CGA to measure the width of the subarachnoid space (primary outcome). Measurement of the subarachnoid space during routine cranial ultrasound was chosen as a pragmatic primary outcome measure performed by a single observer within a multicentre study to provide an indirect method of monitoring brain growth in preterm infants [24]. Occipito-frontal circumference at hospital discharge is associated with neurodevelopmental outcome [25]. We selected subarachnoid space as a surrogate outcome because it accounts for infants who have poor brain growth accompanied by high volumes of cerebrospinal fluid. Secondary outcomes were: (1) head circumference at 36 weeks’ CGA; (2) thyroid hormone ((thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), FT4) plasma concentrations between birth and 36 weeks’ CGA; (3) auxological data (weight, lower leg length (knee to heel distance using knemometry), and occipito-frontal circumference); (4) survival; (5) duration of mechanical ventilation; and (6) chronic lung disease requiring home oxygen. All blood investigations and auxological measurements were made before supplementation (baseline) and on Day 14, Day 21, Day 28 and at 36 weeks’ CGA.

Sample size calculation

Sample size was calculated using the standard deviation (SD) of subarachnoid space width using data from Armstrong et al. [24] Sixty-four infants in each group would have 80% power to detect a difference of 0.67 mm (that is, 0.5*SD) in subarachnoid space width between the groups at 36 weeks’ CGA. We assumed 20% loss to follow-up and aimed to randomize 150 infants. Analyses followed the principle of intention to treat with the allocation broken after determining inclusion in the analysis population for each outcome.

Statistical analyses

A statistical analysis plan was agreed upon before the final analysis. Distributions of continuous outcomes were checked. P values were calculated using a t-test or Mann–Whitney U test as appropriate. Mixed models were used for longitudinal analyses, analysis of covariance to investigate leg length allowing for baseline measurements, and correlations used Spearman’s correlation. Analyses followed the principle of intention to treat with the allocation broken after determining inclusion in the analysis population for each outcome. Trial oversight was by an Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (IDSMC). The IDSMC made recommendations to a Trial Steering Committee, which included a majority (three) of independent members. Quality control and assurance of the trial analyses and design of the trial were supported by the National Institute for Health Research Medicines for Children’s Clinical Trial Unit. The adoption of the study by the UK’s Medicines for Children’s Research Network supported coordination between centres [26] and the trial was subjected to inspection by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Association (MHRA).

Ethical approval

The study was approved by North West Research Ethics Committee (reference number 07/MRE08/37) and by the Medicines for Human Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The parents of each potentially eligible baby were informed of the study’s objectives and overall requirements after birth when the baby had achieved respiratory and haemodynamic stability. The Investigator explained the study fully to the patient’s parent(s)/guardian(s) using a Patient Information Leaflet. The parent/guardian was then given at least 12 h to consider the study. If a parent/guardian was willing for the patient to participate in the study written informed consent was obtained.

Results

A total of 267 infants were assessed for eligibility from five recruiting centres and 153 infants were recruited to the trial. Recruited period commenced September 2007 and recruitment completed in June 2010. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between eligible infants recruited to the trial compared with infants not recruited to the trial. Seventy-eight infants received LT4 supplementation and 75 received placebo. Throughout the study no treatment allocation was unblinded and no suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction (SUSAR) was reported. The CONSORT flow diagram (Figure 1) shows the passage of all recruited and eligible participants.
Figure 1

Consort diagram.

Baseline characteristics between LT4-supplemented and placebo groups are shown in Table 1 and there were no significant differences between groups. The primary and secondary outcomes are shown in Table 2. Subarachnoid space width at 36 weeks’ CGA was similar for the two groups. Multivariate linear analysis of independent factors (gestational age, Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB) score and mean FT4 levels) that might have affected the width of the subarachnoid space showed that mean FT4 levels were significant (beta=−0.37, P=0.03), that is, the lower the mean FT4 level, the wider the subarachnoid space. Gestation was the only independent factor affecting FT4 concentrations (beta 0.81, P=0.001).
Table 1

Demographics and baseline characteristics

 

LT4 -supplemented

Placebo

n= 75

n= 78

Gender (male)

44 (59%)

45 (58%)

Birth weight (grams)

820.7 (183.9)

842.2 (200.0)

Gestational age (weeks)

25.8 (1.3)

25.8 (1.4)

Clinical risk index for babies (CRIB) score

5.7 (3.5)

5.4 (4.1)

Twin births (pairs)

4 (5.3%)

6 (7.7%)

Infant baseline FT4 (pmol/L)

12.2 (6.9)

10.5 (6.3)

Infant baseline leg length (mm)

38.7 (7.1)

39.54 (6.8)

Maternal age (years)

28.8 (5.8)

28.9 (5.8)

Maternal history of smoking during pregnancy

16 (22%)

20 (26%)

Maternal history of alcohol during pregnancy

6 (8%)

4 (5%)

Maternal FT4 (pmol/L)

16.5 (3.2)

15.9 (2.5)

Premature rupture of membrane

30 (40.5%)

24 (30.8%)

Evidence of recent maternal infectiona

21 (28.0%)

19 (24.4%)

Antenatal steroid therapy

72 (96.0%)

73 (93.6%)

Delivery by Caesarean section

24 (32.0%)

27 (35.1%)

Data expressed as mean (SD) for continuous outcomes, x (%) for categorical outcomes.

aMaternal infection was defined as maternal pyrexia >38°C or raised maternal blood C-reactive protein concentration during week before birth.

Table 2

Primary and secondary outcomes

 

LT4 -supplemented

Placebo

Difference (95% CI) LT4 - placebo

P value

Subarachnoid space width at 36 weeks’ CGA (cm)

0.20 (0.06)

0.21 (0.062

−0.01 (−0.03, 0.01)

0.34

n=61

n=57

Head circumference at 36 weeks’ CGA (cm)

30.40 (1.90)

30.61 (2.23)

−0.2 (−0.96, 0.54)

0.49

n=61

n=57

Leg length at 36 weeks’ CGA (mm)

61.52 (8.90)

65.20 (7.11)

−3.80 (−6.91, -0.62)

0.02

n=53

n=53

Mid arm circumference at 36 weeks’ CGA (mm)

8.03 (1.07)

8.19 (1.18)

−0.15 (−0.57, 0.25)

0.47

n=60

n=57

Weight at 36 weeks’ CGA (kg)

1.90 (0.40)

2.03 (0.40)

−0.11 (−0.26, 0.04)

0.14

n=61

n=57

Thyroid volume (mL) at 36 weeks’ CGA

0.57 (0.17)

0.57 (0.17)

0.004 (−0.07, 0.06)

0.99

n=59

n=55

Mortality

14 (18%)

19 (24%)

−0.06(−0.19, 0.08)

0.34

n=75

n=78

Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)

18.30 (13,38)

21.00 (8,42)

−2.00 (−5.00, 8.00)

0.56a

n=58

n=58

Days on total parenteral nutrition (TPN)

14.00 (10,21)

14.50 (11,21)

−1.00 (−4.00, 2.00)

0.59a

n=58

n=58

Chronic lung disease (CLD) diagnosed

42 (56%)

39 (50%)

0.06 (−0.10, 0.22)

0.46

n=61

n=57

Oxygen levels at 36 weeks’ CGA(L/min) for babies with CLD

0.50 (0.08, 1.5)

0.30 (0.08, 1.5)

0.00 (−0.17, 0.20)

0.99a

n=61

n=57

Data expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous parametric outcomes and median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-parametric outcomes.

Student t-test for analysis of continuous parametric outcomes.

aMann-Whitney Wilcoxon test for non-parametric outcomes.

The only secondary outcome difference was that infants who received LT4 had significantly shorter lower leg lengths at 36 weeks CGA than those in the placebo group. However, although the baseline mean lower leg length was not statistically significantly different, it trended longer in the placebo group than in the LT4 supplemented group (mean difference −0.83 mm (95%CI −3.35, 1.70, P=0.51)). Leg growth between baseline and 36 weeks CGA was similar for the two groups (mean difference −2.51 mm (95%CI −0.60 to 5.63), P=0.11), and adjustment for baseline values showed a mean difference that was not significant (−2.80 mm (95%CI −5.80, 0.19), P=0.06).

The plasma FT4 and TSH concentrations are shown in Table 3. The plasma FT4 hormone concentrations at baseline were similar for the two groups. Supplementation effectively significantly raised plasma FT4 concentrations in the LT4-supplemented group initially, but after stopping supplementation, plasma FT4 concentrations in the LT4-supplemented group became significantly lower than in the placebo group. Plasma cortisol levels for the two groups were similar. Figure 2 shows the longitudinal profiles of plasma FT4, TSH, cortisol and ACTH concentrations from baseline to week 36.
Table 3

Plasma thyroxine and TSH concentrations in the LT4-supplemented and placebo groups

 

TSH (mU/L)

FT4 (pmol/L)

 

LT4-supplemented

Placebo

P value

LT4-supplemented

Placebo

P value

Baseline

2.44 (1.06,4.03)

2.15 (1.27,3.40)

0.62a

12.24 (6.93)

10.53 (6.34)

0.18

n=43

n=53

 

n=53

n=54

Day 14

0.05 (0.01,0.14)

2.60 (1.60,4.00)

<0.001 a

20.17 (8.71)

12.01 (5.72)

<0.001

n=42

n=37

n=44

n=38

Day 21

0.06 (0.02,0.35)

2.29 (1.28, 2.76)

<0.001 a

20.89 (9.43)

12.02 (5.73)

<0.001

n=42

n=42

n=42

n=40

Day 28

0.12 (0.01,1.44)

4.0 (2.22. 6.20)

<0.001 a

16.18 (6.23)

11.42 (4.88)

0.005

n=38

n=35

n=38

n=36

Week 36

3.43 (1.82,4.90)

3.60 (2.10,4.70)

0.99a

14.44 (4.56)

16.76 (3.34)

0.009

n=39

n=39

n=44

n=43

Data expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous parametric outcomes and median and interquartile ranges (IQR) for non-parametric outcomes.

Student t-test for analysis of continuous parametric outcomes.

aMann-Whitney Wilcoxon test for non-parametric outcomes.

Figure 2

Interactions between blood FT4, TSH, ACTH and cortisol concentrations. The data points represent the mean value for each variable. ACTH, mean plasma ACTH concentration; Cort, mean plasma cortisol concentration; FT4, mean plasma FT4 concentration; TSH, mean plasma TSH concentration.

There were no significant adverse events noted in the LT4-supplemented or placebo groups.

Discussion

The standard design of a randomised controlled trial is intended to evaluate the effectiveness of the introduction of a new technology to clinical practice, while explanatory trials allow for a better understanding of the mechanisms for any treatment effect found. This trial was designed with a surrogate outcome in order to indicate whether a trial of effectiveness is appropriate and as an explanatory trial [27] in order to improve understanding of the effects and mechanisms of thyroxine supplementation.

A daily supplement of LT4 until 32 weeks’ CGA raised plasma FT4 concentrations during the first 3 weeks after birth. TSH secretion in the LT4-supplemented group was suppressed by day 14 during supplementation, indicating some integrity of the HPT axis in these very immature babies. No documented adverse effects relating to signs or symptoms of hyperthyroidism were documented during the trial. After discontinuation of supplemental LT4, FT4 concentrations were significantly lower in babies who had received supplementation than those given placebo, suggesting an ability to respond to withdrawal of the external supply of hormone at least by 32 weeks’ CGA. Babies in the placebo group had increasing plasma FT4 concentrations between day 28 and week 36, in accordance with the natural history of this condition described previously [28].

Despite evidence that the dose used had an effect on the HPT axis, there was no difference between the LT4-supplemented infants and those in the placebo group with regard to the primary outcome of subarachnoid space width at 36 weeks’ gestation. There were no differences between the two groups for head circumference and weight at 36 weeks’ CGA.

Infants who received LT4 supplementation had significantly shorter lower leg lengths at 36 weeks’ CGA (P=0.02). However, after adjusting for baseline leg length, the difference failed to reach significance (P=0.06). This finding was unexpected. If it represents a real effect of LT4 supplementation, it is possible that higher FT4 levels early in life for LT4-supplemented babies caused an increase in metabolic requirements resulting in less good linear growth [9]. A possible mechanism is through the regulation of endochondral ossification, affecting skeletal development, linear growth and bone formation [29, 30]. TSH, which appeared in this study to be downregulated by LT4-supplements, may also be a direct negative regulator of bone turnover, acting via the TSH receptor on both osteoblasts and osteoclasts [31].

There were no unexpected serious adverse events throughout the trial and no difference in the incidence of adverse events in the two groups. Our results concurred with van Wassenaer et al.[14] who also reported no significant difference in incidence of adverse events in their study.

A surrogate outcome (width of the subarachnoid space) was used to reflect brain size at 36 weeks’ CGA although there are no data relating ultrasound measured width of subarachnoid space with neurodevelopmental outcome. However, head size, and therefore brain size, at term-equivalence is associated with long-term neurodevelopmentalal outcome in extremely preterm neonates so that this surrogate outcome has some validity and has been partially qualified as a surrogate outcome [24, 32]. It is also possible that this outcome failed to detect an important difference between the groups. Brain MRI may provide a more relevant surrogate. However, experience with a previous trial involving a similar group of babies and parents indicated that consent to MRI scans in this population is relatively low [33]. Our experience confirmed this: the parents of only 38% of surviving infants consented to the TIPIT MRI sub-study. Participants in this trial are currently receiving neurodevelopmental follow-up at 42 months of age.

LT4-supplementation increases the metabolism of cortisol to biologically inactive cortisone and might lead to significant adrenal insufficiency [34]. However, there was no evidence of worsening plasma cortisol levels with LT4 supplementation. Our findings were concordant with a study by Valerio et al. who showed that T(3) and T(4) administration did not have any effect on cortisol levels [19].

It remains unclear whether low levels of circulating thyroxine are physiologically appropriate for such very immature babies, or whether THOP is a kind of transient hypothyroidism that is centrally mediated. Therefore, the effects of ‘correction’ of the postnatal FT4 concentrations in the individual premature infant are difficult to predict. It is impossible to predict the severity and duration of the low FT4 state in an individual. It is also not possible to propose a ‘one dose fits all’ approach to normalise the FT4 as it is difficult to estimate the optimal FT4 concentrations for an extremely premature infant without measuring serial FT4 and TSH concentrations. Our results do show significant correlations between low FT4 concentrations and wider subarachnoid space, that is, smaller brain size. It is therefore plausible that it is the actual FT4 concentrations achieved that creates an impact on central nervous system development.

Conclusions

The findings from this study suggest that giving supplementary thyroxine to all babies below 28 weeks’ gestation does not improve short-term outcome. It appears that gestational age alone is not a sufficiently strong risk factor to institute thyroid supplementation for all preterm infants or to use as an inclusion criterion in RCTs. This study suggests that further studies of this intervention should target infants with low FT4 levels, and other approaches to THOP may also be usefully investigated.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the Medicines for Children’s Research Network Clinical Trials Unit for information systems and data support, the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility in Manchester, Orbis Ltd, the Pharmacy Departments of Liverpool Women’s Foundation NHS Trust and Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust for pharmaceutical support, Biochemistry and Radiology Department of Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital and all TIPIT collaborators for their support in the trial.

Funding

The study was funded by the Medical Research Council Clinical Research Fellowship to Dr. Sze May Ng and the Newborn Appeal.

Sponsors

Liverpool Women’s Foundation NHS Trust and University of Liverpool.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool
(2)
Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool
(3)
Department of Endocrinology, Alder Hey Children’s Foundation Trust
(4)
Developmental Biomedicine Research Group, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester
(5)
Neonatal Unit, Wirral Teaching Hospital Foundation Trust
(6)
Neonatal Unit, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
(7)
Neonatal Unit, Royal Preston Hospital
(8)
Department of Biochemistry, Alder Hey Children’s Foundation Trust
(9)
Department of Paediatrics, Southport and Ormskirk NHS Trust

References

  1. Salerno M, Militerni R, Di Maio S, Bravaccio C, Gasparini N, Tenore A: Intellectual outcome at 12 years of age in congenital hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999, 141: 105-110. 10.1530/eje.0.1410105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fisher DA, Klein AH: Thyroid development and disorders of thyroid function in the newborn. N Engl J Med. 1981, 304: 702-712. 10.1056/NEJM198103193041205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Song SI, Daneman D, Rovet J: The influence of etiology and treatment factors on intellectual outcome in congenital hypothyroidism. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2001, 22: 376-384. 10.1097/00004703-200112000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Williams FL, Visser TJ, Hume R: Transient hypothyroxinaemia in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2006, 82: 797-802. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.09.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Biswas S, Buffery J, Enoch H, Bland JM, Walters D, Markiewicz M: A longitudinal assessment of thyroid hormone concentrations in preterm infants younger than 30 weeks’ gestation during the first 2 weeks of life and their relationship to outcome. Pediatrics. 2002, 109: 222-227. 10.1542/peds.109.2.222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chowdhry P, Scanlon JW, Auerbach R, Abbassi V: Results of controlled double-blind study of thyroid replacement in very low-birth-weight premature infants with hypothyroxinemia. Pediatrics. 1984, 73: 301-305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Williams FL, Simpson J, Delahunty C, Ogston SA, Bongers-Schokking JJ, Murphy N, van Toor H, Wu SY, Visser TJ, Hume R: Developmental trends in cord and postpartum serum thyroid hormones in preterm infants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 5314-5320. 10.1210/jc.2004-0869.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. van Wassenaer AG, Kok JH, Dekker FW, de Vijlder JJ: Thyroid function in very preterm infants: influences of gestational age and disease. Pediatr Res. 1997, 42: 604-609. 10.1203/00006450-199711000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. LaFranchi S: Thyroid function in the preterm infant. Thyroid. 1999, 9: 71-78. 10.1089/thy.1999.9.71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lucas A, Morley R, Fewtrell MS: Low triiodothyronine concentration in preterm infants and subsequent intelligence quotient (IQ) at 8 year follow up. BMJ. 1996, 312: 1132-1133. 10.1136/bmj.312.7039.1132. discussion 1133–1134View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Lucas A, Rennie J, Baker BA, Morley R: Low plasma triiodothyronine concentrations and outcome in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child. 1988, 63: 1201-1206. 10.1136/adc.63.10.1201.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Meijer WJ, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Brand R, van den Brande JL: Transient hypothyroxinaemia associated with developmental delay in very preterm infants. Arch Dis Child. 1992, 67: 944-947. 10.1136/adc.67.7.944.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Vanhole C, Aerssens P, Naulaers G, Casneuf A, Devlieger H, Van den Berghe G, de Zegher F: L-thyroxine treatment of preterm newborns: clinical and endocrine effects. Pediatr Res. 1997, 42: 87-92. 10.1203/00006450-199707000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. van Wassenaer AG, Kok JH, de Vijlder JJ, Briet JM, Smit BJ, Tamminga P, van Baar A, Dekker FW, Vulsma T: Effects of thyroxine supplementation on neurologic development in infants born at less than 30 weeks’ gestation. N Engl J Med. 1997, 336: 21-26. 10.1056/NEJM199701023360104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Paneth N: Does transient hypothyroxinemia cause abnormal neurodevelopment in premature infants?. Clin Perinatol. 1998, 25: 627-643.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Osborn D, Hunt R: Prophylactic postnatal thyroid hormones for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 1: CD005948-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Briët JM, Van Wassenaer AG, Dekker FW, De Vijlder JJM, Van Baar A, Kok JH: Neonatal thyroxine supplementation in very preterm children: developmental outcome evaluated at early school age. Pediatrics. 2001, 107: 712-718. 10.1542/peds.107.4.712.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith LM, Leake RD, Berman N, Villanueva S, Brasel JA: Postnatal thyroxine supplementation in infants less than 32 weeks’ gestation: effects on pulmonary morbidity. J Perinatol. 2000, 20: 427-431. 10.1038/sj.jp.7200417.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Valerio PG, van Wassenaer AG, de Vijlder JJ, Kok JH: A randomized, masked study of triiodothyronine plus thyroxine administration in preterm infants less than 28 weeks of gestational age: hormonal and clinical effects. Pediatr Res. 2004, 55: 248-253. 10.1203/01.PDR.0000104153.72572.F5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sackett DL: Explanatory and pragmatic clinical trials: a primer and application to a recent asthma trial. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2011, 121: 259-262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Micheal W: Clinical aspects of brain injury in the preterm infant. The Newborn Brain: neuroscience and clinical applications. 2010, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2Google Scholar
  22. Ng SM, Turner MA, Gamble C, Didi M, Victor S, Weindling AM: TIPIT: a randomised controlled trial of thyroxine in preterm infants under 28 weeks’ gestation. Trials. 2008, 9: 17-10.1186/1745-6215-9-17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. van Wassenaer AG, Kok JH, Endert E, Vulsma T, de Vijlder JJ: Thyroxine administration to infants of less than 30 weeks’ gestational age does not increase plasma triiodothyronine concentrations. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1993, 129: 139-146.Google Scholar
  24. Armstrong DL, Bagnall C, Harding JE, Teele RL: Measurement of the subarachnoid space by ultrasound in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002, 86: F124-F126. 10.1136/fn.86.2.F124.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Cooke RW: Perinatal and postnatal factors in very preterm infants and subsequent cognitive and motor abilities. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005, 90: F60-F63. 10.1136/adc.2004.059188.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Ng SM, Weindling AM: The impact of networks on clinical trials in the United Kingdom. Trials. 2009, 10: 100-10.1186/1745-6215-10-100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. McMahon AD: Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 1365-1376. 10.1002/sim.1120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. van Wassenaer AG, Kok JH, Dekker FW, Endert E, de Vijlder JJ: Thyroxine administration to infants of less than 30 weeks gestational age decreases plasma tri-iodothyronine concentrations. Eur J Endocrinol. 1998, 139: 508-515. 10.1530/eje.0.1390508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shao YY, Wang L, Ballock RT: Thyroid hormone and the growth plate. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006, 7: 265-271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kisakol G, Kaya A, Gonen S, Tunc R: Bone and calcium metabolism in subclinical autoimmune hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Endocr J. 2003, 50: 657-661. 10.1507/endocrj.50.657.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Galliford TM, Murphy E, Williams AJ, Bassett JH, Williams GR: Effects of thyroid status on bone metabolism: a primary role for thyroid stimulating hormone or thyroid hormone?. Minerva Endocrinol. 2005, 30: 237-246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Cooke RW: Are there critical periods for brain growth in children born preterm?. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006, 91: F17-F20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Tan M, Abernethy L, Cooke R: Improving head growth in preterm infants–a randomised controlled trial II: MRI and developmental outcomes in the first year. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008, 93: F342-F346. 10.1136/adc.2007.124255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott SM, Cimino DF: Evidence for developmental hypopituitarism in ill preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2004, 24: 429-434. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement