Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Consideration of factors of low accrual and methods for setting appropriate accrual periods: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study

Original Submission
29 Apr 2024 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Clay
26 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Brunette
5 Aug 2024 Author responded Author comments - Keita Sasaki
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Aug 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Aug 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Brunette
19 Aug 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bin Cheng
25 Aug 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mabel Banson
2 Sep 2024 Author responded Author comments - Keita Sasaki
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Sep 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Sep 2024 Author responded Author comments - Keita Sasaki
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Sep 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Sep 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Brunette
23 Sep 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Clay
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 Sep 2024 Editorially accepted
8 Oct 2024 Article published 10.1186/s13063-024-08508-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page