Skip to main content

Table 2 Information extracted from each article type

From: How is overall survival assessed in randomised clinical trials in cancer and are subsequent treatment lines considered? A systematic review

Article type

Information extracted

Clinical effectiveness paper

Overall survival (OS)

 • Endpoint level (primary, secondary, exploratory, unclear)

 • Definition

 • The analysis used for the interpretation of the primary endpoint

 • Whether a Kaplan-Meier Plot for OS was included

   Whether an at-risk table was included with the plot

   Whether the at-risk table included the number censored/number of events

   Whether confidence intervals were included on the plot

 • Whether a logrank test for OS was conducted

   Whether the test was adjusted or unadjusted for other factors.

 • Whether a Cox proportional hazards model for OS was included

   Whether the results were adjusted or unadjusted for other factors.

Subsequent treatmenta

 • Whether the number or percent of trial participants receiving treatment in follow-up is included in the results or appendix.

 • Whether a summary of the number of treatment lines and/or types of treatments trial participants received.

 • Whether subsequent treatments are discussed in the discussion.

   If yes — what are their thoughts?

 • Whether they did some form of analysis to account for subsequent treatments.

   If yes — what analysis?

Cost-effectiveness paper

Cost-effectiveness

 • What OS results fed into the cost-effectiveness analysis and how were they determined.

Subsequent treatment

 • Whether subsequent treatment costs were incorporated into the cost-effectiveness analysis

 • Whether subsequent treatments are discussed in the discussion.

   If yes — what are their thoughts?

 • Whether they did some form of analysis to account for subsequent treatments.

   If yes — what analysis?

Methodology/review paper

General information

 • Treatment overview or methodology paper?

Subsequent treatment

 • Whether subsequent treatments are discussed.

   If yes — what are their thoughts?

  1. aNote that subsequent treatments included cross-over by design