Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: What do we talk about when we talk about “equipoise”? Stakeholder interviews assessing the use of equipoise in clinical research ethics

Original Submission
10 Jun 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Aug 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adwoa Parker
15 Nov 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Research Square Reviewer 1
9 Dec 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leila Rooshenas
11 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Brian Dewar
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Research Square Reviewer 1
30 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leila Rooshenas
4 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Brian Dewar
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Research Square Reviewer 1
30 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leila Rooshenas
5 Dec 2022 Author responded Author comments - Brian Dewar
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Dec 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Research Square Reviewer 1
13 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leila Rooshenas
20 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Brian Dewar
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Research Square Reviewer 1
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
6 Mar 2023 Editorially accepted
18 Mar 2023 Article published 10.1186/s13063-023-07221-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page