Skip to main content

Table 5 Observed power for different values of the treatment effect (β1) and of sample size, with a strong confounder effect (β2 =  − 1), for 3 logistic regression models: unadjusted for confounder, adjusted in sample-based model, and adjusted in true model

From: Adjustment for baseline characteristics in randomized trials using logistic regression: sample-based model versus true model

Sample size

Unadjusted analysis

Adjusted, sample-based model

Adjusted, true model

Unadjusted analysis

Adjusted, sample-based model

Adjusted, true model

 

Treatment effect β1 = 0.5, continuous confounder

Treatment effect β1 = 0.5, binary confounder

2 × 50

0.24

0.23

0.23

0.24

0.22

0.22

2 × 100

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.41

0.40

0.40

2 × 200

0.66

0.68

0.68

0.67

0.68

0.68

2 × 500

0.96

0.97

0.97

0.96

0.97

0.97

2 × 1000

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 

Treatment effect β1 = 1, continuous confounder

Treatment effect β1 = 1, binary confounder

2 × 50

0.64

0.65

0.65

0.67

0.67

0.67

2 × 100

0.90

0.91

0.91

0.92

0.92

0.92

2 × 200

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

2 × 500

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

2 × 1000

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00