Table 4 Subgroup analyses overview
Objective | Outcome | Hypothesis | Method of analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Type | |||
Subgroup Analysis 1 | ||||
Males versus females | PPSP as defined by the WHO, and of ≥ 4/10 severity | Binary | CBT will be associated with a larger reduction in the prevalence of PPSP in females compared to males | Logistic regression |
Subgroup Analysis 2 | ||||
Any open fracture versus no open fracture | PPSP as defined by the WHO, and of ≥ 4/10 severity | Binary | CBT will be associated with a larger reduction in the prevalence of PPSP in participants with open fractures compared to participants with only closed fractures | Logistic regression |
Subgroup Analysis 3 | ||||
Military, veteran, and first responders versus other patients | PPSP as defined by the WHO, and of ≥ 4/10 severity | Binary | CBT will be associated with a larger reduction in the prevalence of PPSP in participants who are employed by the military, veterans, or first responders | Logistic regression |
Subgroup Analysis 4 | ||||
Higher versus lower SPOC scores | PPSP as defined by the WHO, and of ≥ 4/10 severity | Binary | CBT will be associated with a larger reduction in the prevalence of PPSP in participants with higher vs. lower SPOC scores | Logistic regression |