Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the scoping review and decision-related outcome measurement instruments used

From: Development of a measure to assess the quality of proxy decisions about research participation on behalf of adults lacking capacity to consent: the Combined Scale for Proxy Informed Consent Decisions (CONCORD scale)

Lead author name

Publication date

Setting

Type of decision

Self or proxy decision

Outcome domains

Outcome measurement instrumentsa

Juraskova, I et al. [36]

2015

Oncology

Australia and New Zealand

Participation in breast cancer trial

Self

Anxiety/depression; attitudes towards participating; decisional conflict; involvement preferences; actual (objective) understanding; perceived (subjective) understanding

Including: adapted information style questionnaire; CPS; DCS; QuIC

Politi, MC et al. [37]

2016

Oncology

USA

Participation in cancer trial (multiple cancers and trials)

Self

Clarity of opinion about participating; decision readiness; decisional conflict; intent to participate; knowledge; self-efficacy

Including: questionnaire of eleven objective knowledge items; low literacy version DCS; decision readiness measured on a single-item 5-point scale

Sundaresan, P et al. [38]

2017

Oncology

Australia and New Zealand

Participation in prostate cancer trial

Self

Anxiety/depression; decisional regret; decisional conflict; knowledge

Including: objective knowledge measured using adapted 11-point and 7-point knowledge scales; DCS; QuIC; MDMIC with additional items related to clinical trials; DRS; SWDS

Robertson, EG et al.

2019

Oncology

Australia

Participation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia trial (children and young people)

Self

Acceptability of DA; decisional conflict; emotional safety; feasibility; involvement in decision-making; knowledge

Including: preferred and actual decision‐making role (purpose designed); DCS for parents (purpose designed for adolescents), FCC‐HL‐AYA (adapted for parents and adolescents); adapted versions QuIC

Cox, C et al. [26]

2012

Intensive care

USA

Prolonged mechanical ventilation provision in critical illness

Proxy

Acceptability of DA; conflict with physicians; decisional conflict; feasibility; physician-surrogate discordance; quality of communication; trust in physician; comprehension of relevant information

Including: QOC; DCS

Einterz, S et al. [27]

2014

Nursing homes

USA

Treatment decisions for a person with advanced dementia

Proxy

Clinician–surrogate concordance; involvement in decision-making; knowledge; quality of communication; satisfaction with care

Including: QOC; knowledge assessed with 18 true/false items

Hanson, L et al. [28]

2011

Nursing homes

USA

Feeding options in advanced dementia

Proxy

Clinician–surrogate concordance; decisional regret; frequency of communication with health care providers; involvement in decision-making; knowledge

Including: DCS; knowledge assessed using 19 true/false items; SWDS; DRS

Snyder, A et al. [29]

2013

Nursing homes

USA

Feeding options in advanced dementia

Proxy

Decisional conflict; knowledge

Including: knowledge assessed using 19 true/false items; DCS

White, D et al. [33]

2012

Intensive care

USA

Decisions about treatment options in critical illness

Proxy

Acceptability of DA; decisional confidence; feasibility; perceived effectiveness of DA; quality of communication; self-efficacy

Including: QOC; DSES; DCS

Cox, C et al. [34]

2019

Intensive care

USA

Decision about prolonged mechanical ventilation provision in critical illness

Proxy

Anxiety/depression; clinician–surrogate concordance; decisional conflict; perception of care centeredness; quality of communication; comprehension of relevant information

Including: QOC; DCS

Hanson, L et al. [35]

2017

Nursing homes

USA

Treatment decisions for a person with advanced dementia

Proxy

Advance Care Planning problem score; satisfaction with decision; decisional conflict; involvement in decision-making; quality of communication; satisfaction with care

Including: QOC

Lord, K et al. [30]

2017

Memory clinics

UK

Dementia family carers deciding about place of care

Proxy

Acceptability of DA; anxiety/depression; decisional conflict

Including: DCS

Malloy-Weir, LJ et al. [31]

2017

Nursing homes

Canada

Initiation of antipsychotic medications for a person with dementia

Proxy

Satisfaction with decision; decisional conflict; knowledge

Including: knowledge assessed using an 8–10-item survey based on the Ottawa Knowledge Questionnaire; low-literacy DCS; SWDS

Mitchell, SL et al. [32]

2001

Acute care

Canada

Placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube for older adult > 65 with cognitive impairment

Proxy

Acceptability of DA; decisional conflict; knowledge

Including: knowledge assessed in a multiple-choice format; DCS

  1. CPS Control Preferences Scale, DCS Decisional Conflict Scale, QuIC Quality of Informed Consent Scale, MDMIC Multi-Dimensional Measure of Informed Choice, DRS Decisional Regret Scale, SWDS Satisfaction with Decision Scale, FCC‐HL‐AYA Functional, Communicative, Critical Health Literacy scale, QOC Quality of Communication scale, DSES Decision Self-Efficacy Scale
  2. aRestricted to outcome measurement instruments for decision-related outcomes only