Comparing two advance care planning conversation activities to motivate advance directive completion in underserved communities across the USA: The Project Talk Trial study protocol for a cluster, randomized controlled trial

Table 5 Arm analysis: planned purposive sampling and hypothetical joint display reporting mixed methods integration

ACP behavior	Arm	Hypothetical common themes	Hypothetical arm-specific themes	Hypothetical conclusions from mixed methods integration
Yes	Hello (n=40)	• Family is important • Community is important • Experience with end-of-life decisions	• Find value in ACP conversations • Religion important support system	Those who played the game were 5 times more likely to find value and benefit of ACP than those who used The Conversation Project Starter Guide (p<0.01) Those who participated in an ACP intervention were 5 times more likely to find value and benefit of ACP than those who were in the control arm (p<0.01)
	The Conversation Project Starter Guide (n=40)		• Prior positive experiences within healthcare system • Skeptical of the value of ACP
	TableTopics (Control) (n=20)		• Prior positive experiences within healthcare system
No	Hello (n=40)		• Find value and benefit to ACP conversations
No	The Conversation Project Starter Guide (n=40)		• Religion is an important support system

ISSN: 1745-6215