Skip to main content

Table 1 Study measures’ psychometrics, timeline, and analytic purpose

From: Comparing two advance care planning conversation activities to motivate advance directive completion in underserved communities across the USA: The Project Talk Trial study protocol for a cluster, randomized controlled trial

Instrument name and method

Items and duration

Psychometrics

Timeline

Purpose of variable and analysis plan

Baseline

Immediately post-event

2–4 weeks post-event (phone call)

6 months post-event (phone call)

Demographicsa

(QUANT)

18q, 10 min

N/A

X

   

Baseline covariates

Healthcare System Distrust Scale [77] (QUANT)

9 q; 5 min

Values subscale= Cronbach alpha of 0.73; Competence subscale =Cronbach’s alpha of 0.77 (similar in African Americans and Whites)

X

   

Experience and comfort with games (QUANT)

4 q; 2 min

N/A

X

   

Previous exposure to ACP interventions and/or advance directives (QUANT)

6 q; 5 min

N/A

 

Xb

 

X

Baseline covariates; Possible time-dependent covariates; contamination assessment

ACP Engagement Survey [78] (4-item version) (QUANT)

4 q; 3 min

Cronbach’s alpha 0.84; average 5-point scores were higher for people who engaged in prior planning (P < 0.001); detects change in response (0.4 points) to an ACP intervention. p < 0.001)

X

  

X

Secondary outcome

Acceptability of Intervention (QUANT)

3 q; 2 min

N/A

 

X

  

Descriptive

Conversation Satisfaction [79, 80] (QUANT)

8 q; 5 min

Reliability coefficient range .90–.97 reliabilities, validity coefficients up to .87 via nonverbal assessment scales

 

X

  

Communication Quality Assessment [81, 82]

Data transformation (QUAL to QUANT)

Audio recordings of ACP conversations

Intraclass coefficient range.73–.89, Cronbach alpha .69 to .89

 

During intervention

  

Compare conversation quality between interventions; mediation analyses

Experience and Perceptions of Intervention; Sociocultural environment; Adverse Events (QUAL participant Interview)

30 min

Interview guide follows NIH Best Practices for Rigor, Reliability

  

X

 

Assess adverse events; explores cultural norms related healthcare/ACP; empirical phenomenological analysis

Implementation and Sustainability Outcomes (QUAL host Interview)

30 min

Interview guide follows NIH Best Practices for Rigor, Reliability

  

X

 

Provide implementation data related to inner setting and intervention characteristics; conventional content analysis

AD Completion; “Other ACP Behavior” (QUANT)

6-26 q (depending on branching); 10 min

N/A

   

X

Primary and secondary outcomes

Impact of Sociocultural environment on behavior; Impact of Intervention on medical decision-making (QUAL participant Interview)

30 min

Interview guide follows NIH Best Practices for Rigor, Reliability

   

X

Explore how sociocultural environment impacts the ACP experience; empirical, phenomenological analysis; binary and ordinal logistic regression (via data transformation)

  1. Two surveys were removed from protocol after three events due to survey burdens on participants (social support questionnaire and ACP values and beliefs)
  2. aIncludes race, ethnicity, gender, age, education, income, SES, religiosity, health status, marital status, experience with health decisions, medical decision maker presence at event, etc.
  3. bPrevious experiences with ACP questionnaire was moved to post-intervention timepoint after completing three events to reduce pre-intervention survey burden on participants