Skip to main content

Table 4 Selected SPIRIT item components which were least often adequately reported (<60%) in study protocols of randomised controlled trial protocols that were approved in 2016

From: A longitudinal assessment of trial protocols approved by research ethics committees: The Adherance to SPIrit REcommendations in the UK (ASPIRE-UK) study

SPIRIT component

Belonging to SPIRIT Item Number

Industry sponsorship (n=62)

Non-industry sponsorship (n=46)

Total 2016 (n=108)

Names of protocol contributors/authors

5a

5 (8.1%)

7 (15.2%)

12 (11.1%)

Name and contact details of sponsor

5b

31 (50.0%)

31 (67.4%)

62 (57.4%)

Research question described and justified

6a

35 (56.5%)

13 (28.3%)

48 (44.4%)

Countries where data will be collected listed

9

9 (14.5%)

36 (78.3%)

45 (41.7%)

Eligibility criteria for study centres and who will perform the intervention

10

8 (12.9%)

24 (52.2%)

32 (29.6%)

Sample size: assumed values for outcome

14

41 (36.9%)

20 (43.5%)

61 (56.5%)

Location of participant recruitment

15

7 (11.3%)

36 (78.3%)

43 (39.8%)

Person(s) who will recruit participants

15

5 (8.1%)

31 (61.4%)

36 (33.3%)

Expected recruitment rate

15

20 (32.3%)

25 (45.4%)

45 (41.7%)

Person who will enrol/assign participants

16c

12 (19.4%)

17 (37.0%)

29 (26.7%)

Personnel who will collect data

18a

19 (30.7%)

24 (52.2%)

43 (39.8%)

Strategies to promote participant retention and complete follow-up

18b

38 (61.3%)

16 (34.8%)

54 (50.0%)

DMC is planned or why it is not planned

21a

41 (66.1%)

22 (47.8%)

63 (58.3%)

Audits/external monitoring described

23

26 (41.9%)

3 (5.5%)

29 (26.9%)

Who will have access to full dataset

29

18 (29.0%)

7 (15.2%)

25 (23.2%)

Plans to disseminate trial results to key stakeholders/publication provided

31a

29 (46.8%)

31 (67.4%)

60 (55.6%)

Authorship eligibility criteria

31b

23 (37.1%)

15 (32.6%)

38 (35.2%)

Plans for granting access to full trial protocol

31c

6 (9.7%)

2 (4.4%)

8 (7.4%)