Skip to main content

Table 3 Study findings/themes

From: Maximising recruitment of research participants into a general practice based randomised controlled trial concerning lung diagnosis—staff insights from an embedded qualitative study

Practice ‘motivators’ to join the trial as recruiters

• Having an existing interest in the research topic

• Having the required eligible patient population registered at the practice

• Being financially reimbursed

• Improving lung cancer diagnosis

• Developing the practice

• Expanding the practice network

• Personal and professional development of staff (having clinical and research learning opportunities)

• Having altruistic, benevolent feelings

Health professional interactions with patients

Challenges of identifying and recruiting eligible patients

• Patient eligibility criteria deemed too narrow

• Staff fears that patients would have unnecessary chest X-rays

• GPs feeling overworked and too busy to recruit

• Having a lack of staff to participate in recruitment

• Eligible patients being too busy to participate

• Recruitment documentation confusing resulting in embarrassment and a reluctance to recruit

• GPs too busy dealing with patients’ other needs

Presenting the trial to patients

• Staff worries that trial would increase patient anxiety about lung cancer (resulting in staff carefully choosing words to explain trial purpose)

• The popularity of advertising chest X-rays (at the time) reduced staff worries of increasing patient anxiety

• Ex-smokers were deemed easier to recruit

Completion of patient questionnaires

• Certain questions were deemed irrelevant to study

• Certain questions were deemed too confidential for staff other than GPs to ask

• Many patients required assistance to populate health questionnaires.

• Health questionnaires taking too long to complete

• Staff lacking time to help patients complete health questionnaires

Explaining chest X-ray referrals to patients

• Staff admitted they had mistaken perceptions that patients would prefer randomisation to the chest X-ray rather than control arm of trial

• Patients not having a preference for participation in particular arm of trial was attributed to them being well informed of study equipoise

• A minority of patients were deemed to feel anxious waiting for chest X-ray results

Practice organisation to undertake trial

The importance of establishing key staff members responsible for the study

• One staff member is required to be accountable for the study

• Continuity of staff is necessary. (A reliance on GP locums does not help the trial conduct)

• Part time staff struggle to manage trial commitment

• Research nurses who are paid especially to undertake trials are important

The need for a comprehensive recruitment system

• A team effort is required to recruit patients

• A clear plan is necessary to recruit patients

• Recruitment database searches require timely action to avoid losing potential patient recruits

Organisation of chest X-ray referral

• Patient feedback to staff highlighted easy travel to hospitals whilst others complained of travel distance or no free parking

• Patient feedback to staff highlighted easy and efficient access to chest X-rays

• Staff contact with X-rays Departments highlighted the X-ray staff being unaware of the study

General impact of trial on practice staff

• Staff more aware of long waiting times for a cancer diagnosis

• Staff increased their knowledge of chest X-ray safety

• Staff increased their knowledge of research methods and research engagement

• Trial required one high recruiting practice to increase hours of practice nurse and take on a locum nurse

• Staff anxiety due to concern for patients waiting for chest X-ray results

• Staff fears of invoking unnecessary anxiety in patients

Researcher team support and involvement

Impact of the research team

• Staff happy with involvement and support of research team

• Staff felt that newsletter from research team were beneficial and helped them focus on the trial

Training day delivered by the research team

• Research team helped to reassure practice staff

• Training pitched at a level for non-clinicians beneficial

• Staff found literature given out beneficial before start of trial

• Training was too detailed with too much paperwork leaving some staff feeling overwhelmed

Practice staff suggestions for improvements

• More administrative support

• Decrease study reimbursement in exchange for assistance with recruitment

• Share workload between research team and practice staff

• Having practice managers and non-clinical workers consulted on trial design and delivery before start of trial

• For practices to be given a mentor