Skip to main content

Table 4 Haemodynamic monitoring studies

From: Patient-centred outcomes are under-reported in the critical care burns literature: a systematic review

Author

Year

Study type

Centre(s)

Number

Population

Intervention

Control

Primary outcome

Surrogate vs patient-centred

LFU (days)

Csontos et al. [71]

2008

RCT

1

24

TBSA > 15%

PICCO

Urine output

Central venous O2 saturations

Surrogate

3

Holm et al [72]

2004

RCT

1

50

TBSA > 20%

Transpulmonary thermodilution method for CO

Baxter formula and urine output

In-hospital mortality

Patient-centred

> 25

Tokarik et al. [73]

2013

RCT

1

21

TBSA 10–75% with burn shock

LiDCO

Physician led resuscitation

Cumulative fluid balance

Surrogate

37

Holm et al [74]

2001

CSWCC

1

23

ABSI ≥ 6

Transpulmonary thermodilution for CO

Pulmonary artery catheter for CO

Cardiac output

Surrogate

3

  1. RCT randomised controlled trial, Pseudo RCT pseudo-randomised controlled trial, CSWCC clinical study with concurrent control, TBSA total burn surface area, ABSI abbreviated burn severity index, CO cardiac output, LiDCO lithium dilution cardiac output measurement, LFU longest follow-up