Skip to main content

Table 3 Fluid resuscitation studies

From: Patient-centred outcomes are under-reported in the critical care burns literature: a systematic review

Author

Year

Study type

Centre(s)

Number

Population

Intervention

Control

Primary outcome

Surrogate vs patient-centred

LFU (days)

Bechir et al. [45]

2013

RCT

1

48

TBSA > 15%

Hydroxyethyl starch with RL

RL

Fluid volume administered

Surrogate

28

Bedi et al. [46]

2019

RCT

1

200

TBSA > 30%

Dextrose +  0.9% normal saline

RL

Serum sodium

Surrogate

3

Belba et al. [47]

2009

RCT

1

110

TBSA > 20% adults, > 15% children

Hypertonic lactate saline

RL

Cumulative fluid balance

Surrogate

1

Bortolani et al. [48]

1996

RCT

1

40

TBSA > 30%

Hypertonic lactate saline

RL

Fluid volumes administered

Surrogate

4

Cooper et al. [49]

2006

RCT

3

42

TBSA > 20%

5% albumin

RL

Difference in MODS between groups

Surrogate

28

Goodwin et al. [50]

1983

RCT

1

79

TBSA unknown

Albumin-Ringer’s solution

RL

Cardiac output

Surrogate

7

Gunn et al. [51]

1989

RCT

1

51

> 20% TBSA

Hypertonic lactate saline

RL

Fluid volume administered

Surrogate

3

Hall et al. [52]

1978

RCT

1

172

TBSA > 15% adults, > 10% children

Dextran 70

RL

Urine output

Surrogate

3

Huang et al. [53]

2005

RCT

1

20

TBSA > 40%

Delayed rapid colloid resuscitation

No rapid fluid resuscitation

Fluid volume administered

Surrogate

2

Sudhakar et al. [54]

2008

RCT

1

32

TBSA 30–70%

Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 + RL

RL

Urine output

Surrogate

2

Vlachou et al. [55]

2010

RCT

1

26

TBSA 15–80%

6% hydroxyethyl starch + RL

RL

Fluid balance

Surrogate

2

Waxman et al. [56]

1989

RCT

1

12

TBSA > 25%

10% pentastarch

5% albumin

Haemodynamic parameters

Surrogate

< 1

Aoki et al. [57]

2010

Pseudo RCT

2

20

TBSA > 30%

RA

RL

Gastric CO2

Surrogate

3

O'mara et al. [58]

2005

Pseudo RCT

1

31

TBSA > 40% without inhalational injury OR TBSA > 25% with inhalational injury

RL and FFP

RL

IAP > 25 mmHg

Surrogate

5

Tanaka et al. [59]

2000

Pseudo RCT

1

37

TBSA > 30%

IV ascorbic acid + RL

RL

Fluid volume administered

Surrogate

36

Bechir et al. [60]

2010

CSWCC

1

30

TBSA unknown

Hydroxyethyl starch + RL

RL

Fluid volume administered

Surrogate

60

Bocanegra et al. [61]

1966

CSWCC

1

308

TBSA > 10%

Colloid-plus-glucose or saline-plus-plasma

NS

Shock mortality

Patient-centred

36

Chung et al. [62]

2009

CSWCC

1

52

TBSA > 20%

Brooke formula

Parkland formula

Fluid volume administered

Surrogate

1

Jelenko et al. [63]

1978

CSWCC

1

19

TBSA > 40%

Hypertonic albumin solution

2 groups—(A) RL, (H) hypertonic solution

Weight change

Surrogate

5

Murphy et al. [64]

1999

CSWCC

1

18

TBSA > 40%

RL and 7.5% hypertonic saline-dextran solution

Ringer’s lactate only

Cardiac output parameters as measured by PA catheter

Surrogate

1

Oda et al. [65]

2006

CSWCC

1

36

TBSA > 40%

Hypertonic lactate saline

RL

Fluid volume administered

Surrogate

3

Aboelatta et al. [66]

2013

ISWCC

2

30

TBSA 25–60%

Fluid resuscitation guided by PICCO

Parkland formula

Fluid volume administered

Surrogate

3

Arlati et al. [67]

2006

ISWCC

1

24

TBSA > 20%

Permissive hypovolaemia

Parkland formula

MODS

Surrogate

NA

Berger et al. [68]

2000

ISWCC

1

40

TBSA > 25%

Bicarbonated 0.9% saline (340 mmol) solution

RL

Mortality

Patient-centred

10

Gille et al. [69]

2014

ISWCC

1

80

TBSA > 20%

RA

RL

SOFA score

Surrogate

60

Salinas et al. [70]

2011

ISWCC

1

70

TBSA > 20%

Computer led algorithm

Parkland formula

Total crystalloid volume in first 48 h

Surrogate

NA

  1. RCT randomised controlled trial, Pseudo RCT pseudo-randomised controlled trial, CSWCC clinical study with concurrent control, ISWCC intervention study without concurrent control, TBSA total burn surface area, RL Ringer’s lactate solution, RA Ringer’s acetate solution, FFP fresh frozen plasma, NS 0.9% sodium chloride solution, MODS multiple organ dysfunction score, IAP intra-abdominal pressure, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment, LFU longest follow-up