Peer Review reports
From: Multiple secondary outcome analyses: precise interpretation is important
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Oct 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shahnaz Klouche |
| 27 Oct 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Catriona Keerie |
| 2 Nov 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cristina MartÃn-Arriscado |
| 4 Nov 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Larissa Burggraf |
| 8 Nov 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charity G. Patterson |
| 13 Nov 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarkis Manoukian |
| 1 Dec 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard A. Parker |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Dec 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Catriona Keerie |
| 15 Dec 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shahnaz Klouche |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Dec 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Jan 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s13063-021-05975-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.