Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of the number of more common measurement methods used to assess treatment outcomes in each domain category from the Dodd et al. [90] taxonomy. Only items where there were more than 10 reports of the outcome domain (Additional file 9) and only those methods reported more than once across the 72 included studies are selected for reporting here. See Additional file 10 for a complete list of instruments

From: Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in designs of clinical trials for interventions that seek to restore bilateral and binaural hearing in adults with unilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (‘single-sided deafness’)

Outcome domains

Investigator administered

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Unclear

Psychophysical instruments

Objective instruments

Technical and lab measures

Investigator observation / judgement

Numerical rating scale

Multi-item questionnaire

Diary

Unclear

Physiological or clinical core area, 6: ear and labyrinth outcomes

 Hearing thresholds

8

1

 Speech in noise

47

2

 Speech in quiet

18

2

 Speech hearing

6

3

 Tinnitus loudness

1

2

 Spatial hearing

1

3

 Localisation

33

1

 Quality of hearing

2

1

2

 Reverberation

1

1

Life impact core area, 30: global quality of life

 Tinnitus symptom severity

9

 Hearing disabilities

9

 Disease-specific quality of life

6

Life impact core area, 32a: delivery of care—satisfaction / patient preference

 Device benefit

2

8

 Device use

3

1

2

1

1

 Satisfaction

2

5

1

 Aversiveness

1

 

Adverse events core area, 38: adverse events / effects

 Adverse effects

1

2

6