Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study

Original Submission
11 Jun 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beatriz Goulao
9 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Kerry
6 Oct 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Bobb
29 Oct 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beatriz Goulao
13 Dec 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Bobb
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Oct 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jan 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beatriz Goulao
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
6 Feb 2020 Editorially accepted
23 Mar 2020 Article published 10.1186/s13063-020-4148-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page