Skip to main content

Table 5 Type I error rate when estimating under the null hypothesis of no difference between arms, with 30% missing data in same direction for each of the three simulation methodsa

From: The mixed model for repeated measures for cluster randomized trials: a simulation study investigating bias and type I error with missing continuous data

k, clusters per arm

m, subjects per cluster

Method 1

Method 2

Method 3

ICC = 0.01

ICC = 0.1

ICC = 0.01

ICC = 0.1

ICC = 0.01

ICC = 0.1

5

10

3.9

6.3

2.7

4.4

4.9

6.5

20

4.1

5.6

3.7

6.1

4.7

7.8

50

5.2

4.4

5.4

4.1

4.8

6.8

10

10

4.1

6.0

4.8

5.6

5.0

5.6

20

5.0

6.2

4.9

5.7

5.3

7.0

50

4.7

4.2

5.3

5.4

6.4

8.1

20

10

5.0

4.3

5.3

4.1

4.3

6.4

20

4.3

6.2

5.8

3.8

5.0

5.7

50

4.8

5.2

4.8

4.3

5.6

5.7

50

10

5.0

5.8

4.8

4.9

6.5

6.5

20

5.5

5.5

5.1

5.0

6.1

6.3

50

5.2

4.7

4.5

5.1

6.4

6.7

  1. aSimulation method 1 = compound symmetry; method 2 = Toeplitz; method 3 = random intercepts and slopes