Skip to main content

Table 3 Key themes identified from patient telephone interviews and HCP advisory board meetings

From: Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials

Trial stage

Patients (N = 10)

GPs (n = 9)

PMs (n = 7)

Pre-trial experience

Positive

Positive

Positive

• Personal health benefit

• Supporting science

• Access to new treatment

• Altruism

• Financial benefits

• Trial research nurse team

• Patient benefit

• Influence of other participating sites

• Access to hard-to-reach patients

• Sponsor communication/support

• Inclusion and exclusion criteria

• Patient benefit

• Practice financial benefit

• Novel study design

• Access hard-to-reach patients

• Achieve QOF targets

• Elicit large data source

 

Negative

Negative

 

• Room availability

• Recruitment

• Room availability

• SLS training

• Recruitment

• Data collection process

Experience during the trial

Positive

Positive

Positive

• Trial research nurse team

• Study assessments

• Study location

• Free prescriptions

• Expectations met

• Negative pre-conceptions dispelled

• Patient knowledge of condition

• Better quality of care

• Study organization

• Trial research nurse team

• Minimal burden on workload

• Expectations met

• Knowledge from practice nurses

• Patient health improvement

• Study organization

• Minimal impact on practice

• Reduced practice workload

• Sponsor support

• Trial research nurse team

Negative

Negative

Negative

• Not receiving study treatment

• No study results

• Non-participating pharmacies

• Prescriptions

• eCRF system

• Training

• Trial staff turnover

• Recruitment

• Non-participating pharmacies

• Financial burden (e.g. patient reimbursement)

• Invoice/prescription system

• Trial staff turnover

• Transfer and data storage

• Room availability

• Reporting hospitalizations

Post-trial experience

Positive

Positive

Positive

• Improved knowledge of condition

• Involved in a research study

• Improved inhaler adherence

• Improved symptoms and health

• Treatment effectiveness

• Patient treatment satisfaction

• Willingness to prescribe study drug

• Professional development

• Confidence in research

• High degree of satisfaction

• Expectations surpassed

• Financial benefit invested in the practice

Negative

Negative

Negative

• Did not receive COPD PLS

• Unaware of COPD results and COPD PLS

• No incentive to share results

• Unaware of COPD results and COPD PLS

• Current PLS of low value to patients

Future trial experience

Positive

Positive

Positive

• High likelihood of participating in research

• Involvement in design of studies

• High likelihood of participating in research

• Confidence in actively seeking research

• Involvement in design of studies

• High likelihood of participating in research

• Increased confidence to participate

• Involvement in design of studies

• Role similar with that in SLS

Negative

 

Negative

• Unlikely to actively seek research

 

• Impact of GDPR implementation

• Unlikely to actively seek research

  1. COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, eCRF electronic case report form, GDPR General Data Protection Regulation, GP general practitioner, HCP healthcare professional, QOF Quality Outcomes Framework, PM practice manager, PLS plain language summary, SLS Salford Lung Studies