Table 3 Summary of outcomes, measures, and analysis plan using the RE-AIM framework
RE-AIM element | Outcome | Outcome measure; source | Data collection time point | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Reach The reach of the intervention into the target population | Participants | Proportion of eligible patients who consent; self-report | T0 | Simple proportions and range across sites |
Sample characteristics | Demographics including chronic conditions; self-report, EMR | T0 | Simple proportions and range across sites | |
Volunteer visits | Number of volunteer visits; program records | T6 | Frequency count across sites | |
Effectiveness Positive and adverse effects of the intervention | Hospitalizations* | Number of hospitalizations; EMR | T0, T6 | Poisson regression or negative binomial regression |
Physical activity* | Total minutes spent doing moderate, vigorous, activity and walking (IPAQ); self-report; | T0, T6 | Multiple linear regression | |
Sitting | Hours sitting (IPAQ); self-report | T0, T6 | ||
Patient enablement | PEI; self-report | T0, T6 | ||
Quality of life | EQ 5D-5L; self-report | T0, T6 | ||
Treatment burden | MTBQ; self-report | T0, T6 | ||
Disease burden | DBMA; self-report | T0, T6 | ||
Emergency room or urgent care | Number of emergency room or urgent care visits; EMR | T0, T6 | Poisson regression or negative binomial regression Poisson regression or negative binomial regression | |
Falls | Number of falls; EMR | T0, T6 | ||
Medications | Number of medications; EMR | T0, T6 | ||
Primary care visits | Number of primary care visits; EMR | T0, T6 | ||
Negative effects | Unmet expectations; self-report | T6 | Descriptive analysis across sites | |
Labeling effect of screening tools; self-report | T6 | |||
Number and nature of serious adverse events; EMR | T6 | |||
Adoption Representation of settings and intervention agents who are willing to initiate and actively participate in program |  | Number of health care providers who consent to participate; program records | T6 | Simple proportions across sites |
Proportion of health care team members participating by health care profession; program records | T6 | Simple proportions across sites, across professions | ||
NoMAD tool£ (NPT traffic light process); program records | T1, T2, T3, T6, T9, T12 | Descriptive analysis across sites | ||
Number of volunteers recruited, trained, active, dropouts: program records | T6 | Simple proportions across sites | ||
Implementation Fidelity to the intervention and adaptations | Consistency of delivery as intended | Number of home visits, reports sent to clinic, number and nature of actions from TAP-Huddle; EMR Fidelity checklist; program records | T6 | Frequencies and/or proportions across sites where appropriate |
Cost effectiveness | Program costs; program records QALYs; self-report | T6 | Economic evaluation | |
Barriers and facilitators or adaptations of implementation | Focus groups/interviews, program records | T6 – T12 | Descriptive thematic analysis | |
Maintenance Extent to which program becomes sustained over time | Extent that program becomes institutionalized, part of practice or policies created | Proportion of patients and team members who recommend program; self-report | T6 | Simple proportions across sites |
Indication of sites continuing program; program records | T12 | Frequency count across sites | ||
NoMAD survey£; self-report | T12 | Descriptive analysis across sites |