Skip to main content

Table 1 Modified FDI criteria

From: Clinical efficacy of ceramic versus resin-based composite endocrowns in Chinese adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Category

Sub-categories

Grading

a) Functional properties

1. Marginal adaptation

A. Clinically excellent

B. Clinically good

C. Borderline quality/acceptance, repair necessary/possible

D. Clinically unsatisfactory (replacement necessary)

2. Wear

3. Proximal anatomical form (contact point/food impact)

4. Radiographic examination

5. Patient’s view

b) Biological properties

1. Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction

2. Tooth integrity

3. Periodontal response

4. Adjacent mucosa

5. Oral and general health

c) Esthetic properties

1. Surface luster

2. Staining

 a. Surface

 b. Margin

3. Color match and translucency

4. Esthetic anatomical form

5. Fracture of material and retention

  1. The FDI criteria with their various categories and their grading (in italic: the revisions of 2010)