Skip to main content

Table 1 Components of each shortening strategy and cost differences compared with standard 12-week treatment

From: The design and statistical aspects of VIETNARMS: a strategic post-licensing trial of multiple oral direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment strategies in Vietnam

Shortening strategy

Resource use of providing treatment

Difference in cost compared with standard 12-week treatment

Mean weeks of DAA

Number of PEG-IFN injections

Number of visits required

Number of VL tests

Standard 12-week treatment

12

0

3a

1a

–

PEG-IFN + DAA (4 weeks’ treatment, weekly PEG-IFN)

4

4

6

1

-8x(weekly drug cost) + 4x(interferon cost) + 3x(visit cost)

Response-guided therapy (4, 8, or 12 weeks’ treatment)

9.6b

0

4

2

−3.4x(weekly drug cost) + 1x(visit cost) +1x(VL cost)

Induction/maintenance (7 days/week for 2 weeks, then 5 days/week)

9.14

0

4c

1

−3.86x(weekly drug cost) + 1x(visit cost)

  1. Abbreviations: DAA direct-acting antiviral, PEG-IFN pegylated-interferon, VL viral load.
  2. a Assuming minimum visits at treatment initiation, end of treatment, end of treatment plus 12 weeks (where VL is done once to assess cure)
  3. b Assuming 1:3:1 receiving 4:8:12 weeks of treatment. One extra visit and VL at day 7 to assess initial VL response
  4. c Assuming one extra visit at week 2 when move from induction to maintenance phase