Effects of the Informed Health Choices primary school intervention on the ability of children in Uganda to assess the reliability of claims about treatment effects, 1-year follow-up: a cluster-randomised trial

Table 15 Self-reported behaviour: assessment of the basis of treatment claims

For the last treatment claim that you heard, did you think about what that treatment claim that you heard was based on?
	Control schools N = 2844	Intervention schools N = 3943
Missing	50 (1.8%)	57 (1.4%)
No	512 (18.0%)	845 (21.4%)
Yes	1387 (48.8%)	2116 (53.7%)
I don’t remember	895 (31.5%)	925 (23.5%)
Odds ratio (yes versus other)	1.18 (95% CI, 0.95–1.47) P = 0.130
Adjusted difference^a	4.1% (95% CI, −1.2% to 9.6%)

^aThe difference is an adjusted difference, based on a mixed model with a random effects term for the clusters and the stratification variables modelled as fixed effects, using logistic regression. The odds ratio from the logistic regression has been converted to a difference using the intervention schools as the reference and the inverse of the odds ratios shown here

ISSN: 1745-6215