Skip to main content

Table 5 Percentage of patients and physicians who fully agree with the statement (A) and concordance of patients’ and physicians’ estimation of patient understanding of information (B)

From: Patients’ and physicians’ disagreement on patients’ understanding of clinical cancer trial information: a pairwise pilot study of mirroring subjective assessments compared with objective measurements

  

A

B

 
 

Patient’s/physician’s questions

Patient fully agrees (%)*

Physician fully agrees (%)*

Number of pairs*

Number of concordant pairs

Only patient fully agrees

Only physician fully agrees

McNemar’s test P value

1.

I/the patient understood the oral information completely

82.6

56.5

46

26

16

4

0.012

2.

I/the patient understood the written information completely

80.0

51.1

45

26

16

3

0.004

3.

I/the patient understood all words and expressions that the physician used during the oral information

78.3

52.2

46

24

17

5

0.017

4.

I/the patient understood all words and expressions in the written information

64.4

42.2

45

21

17

7

0.064

5.

I/the patient understood how the treatment would be carried out and followed up

91.3

65.2

46

28

15

3

0.008

6.

I/the patient understood what side effects the treatment may have

88.9

60.0

45

26

16

3

0.004

7.

I/ the patient understood the purpose of the research study

87.0

71.7

46

27

13

6

0.167

  1. *If either patient or physician had not answered the question the pair was discarded from both A and B