Our preliminary framework consists of three elements: | |
(A) What sorts of bias can arise from measurement reactivity (and what are the relationships to the existing well-known forms of bias)? | |
 1. Main effects of measurement on trial outcome | |
 2. Where there is an interaction between measurement and trial-arm status on outcome | |
 3. Where measurement results in study dropout | |
(B) How does measurement produce changes in people (i.e. what are the mechanisms)? | |
 1. Measurement changes the performance of that behaviour or reports of performance of that behaviour | |
 2. Measurement changes emotional states or reports of emotional state | |
 3. Measurement changes questionnaire or study completion rate | |
(C) What are the characteristics of measurement, people and context that can lead to or moderate the risk of such biases (i.e. when might measurement reactivity be anticipated)? | |
 1. Features of measurement that produce reactivity | |
 2. Features of outcome measurement (may be the same as above) | |
 3. Features of participants being measured | |
 4. Other features of context surrounding measurement or trial not captured in other categories |