Skip to main content

Table 1 SLATE II algorithm screens and differences between SLATE I and SLATE II

From: Improved simplified clinical algorithm for identifying patients eligible for immediate initiation of antiretroviral therapy for HIV (SLATE II): protocol for a randomized evaluation

Screen

Overall purpose of screen

Reasons for screening out (SLATE II)

Justification

If screen out, anticipated next step

Differences from SLATE I

Symptom report and TB module

Identify self-reported conditions that require additional investigation

Severe TB symptoms regardless of LAM or positive LAM test result

See text for explanation; clinician’s judgment as to seriousness

Referral for TB test

In SLATE I, any TB symptom (cough, fever, night sweats, weight loss) of any duration or seriousness was a criterion for screening out. No LAM test was used. Clinicians in SLATE I were trained to regard any other symptom as a criterion for screening out, rather than only relevant, serious symptoms

Persistent headache for > 2 days

Symptom of cryptococcal meningitis [31, 32]

Referral for CrAg screening

Other serious self-reported symptoms

Other symptoms could indicate the need for further clinical investigation; clinician’s judgment as to seriousness

Referral for additional clinical consultation

Medical history

Through self-report, identify individuals on concurrent medications or who may struggle with adherence

Started TB treatment within the past 2 weeks and not yet tolerated, based on clinical judgment

Guidelines recommend up to 2 weeks’ delay in ART initiation for patients starting TB treatment to allow them to tolerate the TB medications before starting ART.

ART initiation by the clinic as soon as TB treatment is tolerated

In SLATE I, all TB treatment initiated within 14 days, any prior default from ART, and any report of substance abuse were always criteria for screening out. These were removed and replaced in SLATE II

Previous ART default due to rash, hepatitis, or a psychiatric or neurologic condition or default from second line regimen

Prescription of a different regimen may be required. Default from first-line ART for other reasons is no longer a criterion for screening out

Referral for additional clinical consultation

Concurrent medications or conditions that may create problems for patients

Some medications, ongoing intravenous recreational drug use, or mental illness may interact with ARVs or hamper adherence

Referral for additional clinical or pharmacy consultation

Physical examination

Record weight, height, temperature and blood pressure and identify any observable serious conditions that require additional investigation

Any conditions that call for further investigation prior to ART initiation

Patient may identify previously unreported symptoms or clinician may observe conditions that indicate a need for further clinical investigation before starting ART; clinician’s judgment as to seriousness

Referral for additional clinical consultation

No major differences. Clinicians in SLATE II are encouraged to use clinical judgment of seriousness of any conditions identified

Readiness assessment

Confirm that the patient feels ready to start ART today

Responses that indicate reluctance, hesitation, or serious concerns in starting and adhering to treatment

Creates a structured opportunity for clinician and patient to discuss any concerns that the patient has not yet raised

Referral for additional counseling and follow-up support as indicated

Logistical reasons for not being ready, such as concern about future transportation to the clinic, are no longer criteria for screening out in SLATE II

  1. CrAg Cryptococcal antigen, LAM lipoarabinomannan antigen of mycobacteria