Skip to main content

Table 1 Required samples sizes for three different scenarios of increases in risk-appropriate screening in the intervention arm compared to the control arm, assuming rate of risk-appropriate screening of 1% and 25% at baseline and level of significance = 0.05

From: The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Scenario (intervention vs control)

Absolute difference in appropriate screening

Power

Sample size per arm

Sample size per arm allowing for 10% attrition

10% improvement vs 0%

11% vs 1%

90%

117

130

10% improvement vs 2.5%

11% vs 3.5%

90%

250

278

10% improvement vs 5%

11% vs 6%

90%

652

725

10% improvement vs 0%

35% vs 25%

80%

329

366