Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimated regression coefficients (log-odds ratios), 95% confidence intervals and Wald test p values for the treatment and learning effects from the primary analysis and learning effects models

From: Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection

Model

Effect

Adjusted estimate

95% confidence interval for adjusted estimate

p

Lower

Upper

Primary analysis model

Robotic surgery (vs. laparoscopic)

− 0.488

− 1.168

0.191

0.158

Learning effects model

Robotic surgery (vs. laparoscopic)

− 0.916

− 1.784

− 0.049

0.039

Surgeon’s robotic experience (log; 1-unit increase)

0.074

− 0.706

0.854

0.852

Surgeon’s laparoscopic experience (cubic; 10^8-unit increase)

0.309

− 1.1033

0.4852

0.445

Interaction: surgeon’s robotic experience (log; 1-unit increase) × robotic surgery

− 1.076

− 2.110

− 0.041

0.042

Interaction: surgeon’s laparoscopic experience (cubic; 10^8-unit increase) × robotic surgery

− 0.160

− 2.153

1.833

0.875