Skip to main content

Table 2 Questionnaire’s score interpretation

From: Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study

Total score (points)

Original questionnaire

(Sleem et al., 2010) [15]

Total score (points)

Modified questionnaire

(present study)

Interpretation

>130/200

>114/175

Excellent adherence

66–130/200

58–114/175

Good adherence

>66/200

>58/175

Poor adherence