Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health

Original Submission
26 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bethan Copsey
4 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Ouellet-Courtois
27 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Dal-Re
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bethan Copsey
8 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Ouellet-Courtois
11 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Dal-Re
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
13 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-1899-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page