Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of 509 included studies

From: The association of funding source on effect size in randomized controlled trials: 2013–2015 – a cross-sectional survey and meta-analysis

 

For-profit (n = 148)

Mixed profit and nonprofit (n = 117)

Nonprofit (n = 244)

Medical journal, n (%)

   

JAMA

17 (11%)

37 (32%)a

63 (26%)a

The Lancet

45 (30%)

33 (28%)

91 (37%)

New England Journal of Medicine

86 (58%)

47 (40%)a

90 (37%)a

Sample size

 Median

800

637

647

Intervention type, n (%)

 Drug

118 (80%)

65 (56%)a

93 (38%)a,b

 Device

18 (12%)

6 (5%)

16 (7%)

 Procedure

4 (3%)

7 (6%)

42 (17%)a,b

 Procedure and/or device/drug/behavior

5 (3%)

21 (18%)a

21 (9%)b

 Behavior

0 (0%)

1 (1%)

45 (18%)a,b

 Other

3 (2%)

17 (15%)a

27 (11%)a

Endpoint, n (%)

 Clinical

110 (74%)

91 (78%)

196 (80%)

 Surrogate

38 (26%)

26 (22%)

48 (20%)

  1. aDenotes statistical significant difference compared with the for-profit-funded group (p < 0.05)
  2. bDenotes statistical significant difference compared with mixed group funded research (p < 0.05)