Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study

Original Submission
5 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brennan Kahan
20 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Thompson
2 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caroline Kristunas
2 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Barker
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brennan Kahan
12 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caroline Kristunas
14 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Thompson
13 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Barker
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Thompson
13 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Barker
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Barker
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-1862-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page