Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?

Peer Review reports

Original Submission
30 Jul 2015	Submitted	Original manuscript
9 Nov 2015	Reviewed	Reviewer Report - Jinhui Ma
23 Mar 2016	Reviewed	Reviewer Report - Matteo Quartagno
12 May 2016	Author responded	Author comments - Mavuto Mukaka
Resubmission - Version 2
12 May 2016	Submitted	Manuscript version 2
20 May 2016	Reviewed	Reviewer Report - Matteo Quartagno
6 Jun 2016	Reviewed	Reviewer Report - Jinhui Ma
11 Jun 2016	Author responded	Author comments - Mavuto Mukaka
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jun 2016	Submitted	Manuscript version 3
Publishing
29 Jun 2016	Editorially accepted
22 Jul 2016	Article published	10.1186/s13063-016-1473-3

Back to article page