Peer Review reports
From: Can “realist” randomised controlled trials be genuinely realist?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Dec 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Mar 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Loukia Spineli |
| 9 Mar 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosa Lamarca |
| 5 Apr 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Sara Van Belle |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Apr 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Apr 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Loukia Spineli |
| 1 May 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosa Lamarca |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 May 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Jul 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s13063-016-1407-0 |
You can find further information about peer review here.