Table 3 Second part of the description of the overall clinical performance score: number and percentage of two and three-surface fillings that lost approximal contact in distributed follow-up checks
Class | Material | Fillings | Classification score; n = observations | 1 year | 2 years | 3 years | 4 years | Poor total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
II | GP fast | 225 | n | 160 | 111 | 76 | 42 | |
1 (clinically excellent)/ | 135 (84) | 96 (86) | 67 (88) | 36 (86) | ||||
2 (clinically good)/ | ||||||||
3 (clinically sufficient) | ||||||||
4 (clinically unsatisfactory) | 21 (13) | 11 (10) | 8 (11) | 4 (10) | ||||
5 (clinically poor) | 4 (2) | 4 (4) | 1 (1) | 2 (5) | 11 | |||
Equia Fil | 211 | n | 160 | 116 | 71 | 28 | ||
1 (clinically excellent)/ | 141 (88) | 106 (91) | 60 (85) | 26 (93) | ||||
2 (clinically good)/ | ||||||||
3 (clinically sufficient) | ||||||||
4 (clinically unsatisfactory) | 16 (10) | 5 (4) | 7 (10) | 1 (4) | ||||
5 (clinically poor) | 3 (2) | 5 (4) | 4 (6) | 1 (4) | 13 | |||
II MOD | GP fast | 13 | n | 10 | 10 | 3 | 2 | |
1 (clinically excellent)/ | 8 (80) | 10 (100) | 3 (100) | 2 (100) | ||||
2 (clinically good)/ | ||||||||
3 (clinically sufficient) | ||||||||
4 (clinically unsatisfactory) | 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||||
5 (clinically poor) | 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 | |||
Equia Fil | 21 | n | 16 | 9 | 5 | 2 | ||
1 (clinically excellent)/ | 9 (57) | 7 (78) | 2 (40) | 2 (100) | ||||
2 (clinically good)/ | ||||||||
3 (clinically sufficient) | ||||||||
4 (clinically unsatisfactory) | 5 (31) | 2 (22) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) | ||||
5 (clinically poor) | 2 (12) | 0 (0) | 2 (40) | 0 (0) | 4 |