Skip to main content

Table 2 Primary and secondary outcomes

From: Comparison of exenatide with biphasic insulin aspart 30 on glucose variability in type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

 

Outcome measure:

Primary outcome

To compare the effect of exenatide versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 on glucose variability in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy.

Absolute change of MAGE from baseline to Week 16

Secondary outcome

To compare the effect of exenatide versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 on inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, HbA1c, weight, risk of hypoglycemia and cardiovascular risk markers.

HbA1c at baseline and Week 16

Hours of hypoglycemia assessing by CGMS at baseline and Week 16

SMBG at baseline and Week 16

Blood pressure and lipids at baseline and Week 16

Body weight, BMI and WC at baseline and Week 16

Inflammatory markers (MCP-1, hs-CRP) at baseline and Week 16

Urinary albumin at baseline and Week 16

Safety outcome

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of exenatide in relation to biphasic insulin aspart 30.

Adverse events/serious adverse events

Vital signs

Clinical hypoglycemia

Collection of clinical chemistry/hematology parameters

Electrocardiogram

  1. T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; CGMS, continuous glucose monitoring system; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein