Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kudenchuk |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kudenchuk |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
14 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kudenchuk |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Feb 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stuart Pocock |
5 Feb 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - L. Brent Mitchell |
29 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kudenchuk |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
29 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
11 Mar 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stuart Pocock |
20 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kudenchuk |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
20 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
24 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kudenchuk |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
24 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
25 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kudenchuk |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
25 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
2 May 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
2 May 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-9-24 |
You can find further information about peer review here.