Peer Review reports
From: Responder analyses and the assessment of a clinically relevant treatment effect
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 May 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Jun 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Snapinn |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Senn |
2 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Borm |
8 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chengjie Xiong |
13 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Snapinn |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Senn |
24 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Borm |
21 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Snapinn |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
25 Oct 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Oct 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-8-31 |
You can find further information about peer review here.