We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.
Evaluation of measurement properties of pediatric acute diarrheal severity scoring systems
© Ardestani et al 2015
- Published: 24 November 2015
- Construct Validity
- Methodological Quality
- Measurement Property
- Measurement Instrument
Interventional studies of pediatric acute diarrhea have used heterogeneous outcome measures, often with poor reporting of their measurement properties. Use of different measures or measures that lack sound measurement properties in trials with similar primary outcomes hampers comparison and knowledge synthesis.
In this systematic review, we evaluated the measurement properties of ten commonly used instruments to assess the severity of acute diarrhea in children.
Medline, EMbase and the Cochrane library were searched using a highly sensitive search filter developed by Terwee et al. to identify studies that evaluated measurement properties. This search filter was combined with the names of ten pre-identified scales of pediatric diarrhea severity. Reference lists from included articles and the original publications for the ten diarrhea scales were also reviewed. Eligibility criteria were: 1) ability to develop or evaluate the measurement properties – i.e. content validity, construct validity, reliability or responsiveness – of a measurement instrument; 2) ability to measure severity of diarrhea/gastroenteritis; and 3) ability of the scale to be developed or adapted for the pediatric population (0-18 y/o). The methodological quality of the included studies and the results of measurement properties were appraised using checklists from the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) group.
The search yielded 98 potentially relevant articles, of which only 2 articles met inclusion criteria. Studies that did not evaluate measurement properties of the identified scales or did not measure pediatric diarrhea were excluded. Both included studies evaluated the measurement properties of the “Modified Vesikari score” (MVS). Assessment of methodological quality determined that both studies were of ‘poor’ quality in most properties except for hypothesis testing, which was rated as ‘good’. MVS was rated as positive for face and construct validity and indeterminate for internal consistency and interpretability.
Despite their wide use, we found a disturbing lack of evidence evaluating validity and reliability of the most commonly used pediatric diarrhea severity scales. Further research with sound methodology is strongly recommended to properly evaluate the measurement properties of these scales. Moreover, to avoid heterogeneity, we encourage researchers to develop scales that measure outcomes identified in a newly developed core outcome set by the COMMENT group for clinical trials in acute diarrhea.
SV receives salary support as an AIHS Health Scholar. We would like to thank Dr. Susanne K. Jones for her assistance with the database search and Dr. Caroline Terwee for her guidance with the application of COSMIN criteria.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.