- Poster presentation
- Open Access
‘Getting back to normal’: using patients’ lived experience to inform a core outcome set for cardiac arrest clinical trials
© Whitehead et al 2015
Published: 24 November 2015
A recent review of outcome reporting in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) clinical trials detailed a lack of transparency and heterogeneity, highlighting the need to establish a core outcome set (COS)(Whitehead et al., 2015). Moreover, the review highlighted the dominance of outcomes which focused on the pathophysiological manifestations of the event and clinicians’ perspectives, with an absence of outcomes which sought to explore the patients’ perspective. To ensure the development of a COS with relevance and meaning to all stakeholders - patients, clinicians and researchers, we sought to explore the views of patients and their partners to improve our understanding of the outcomes that really matter.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with OHCA patients and, where possible their partners separately to gain a better understanding of the patients’ experience. Participants were recruited from a large NHS trust in the West Midlands, UK. Inclusion criteria included aged >18 years, cognitively able, and not critically ill. An interpretative phenomenological analysis was adopted.
A convenience sample of eight patients (62.8 years (SD 13.6); range 41-79; n=5 male (62.5%) and three of their partners were interviewed, between 3 and 12 months post-arrest. At the time of interviews 2 had returned to work, 1 was planning a phased return to work, 4 were previously retired and 1 was previously unemployed. Analysis highlighted an overarching theme of “disruption to normality” with patients’ expressing a strong desire to get back to normal. The superordinate themes which contribute to this disruption include: survival, physical function, emotional well-being, social well-being and participation and the impact on others.
This study details an exploration of the lived experience of the survivors of cardiac arrest and their partners. It provides clear, patient-derived guidance for the health outcomes that matter to patients and which should be considered for COS inclusion.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.