- Poster presentation
- Open Access
TACT: Research Partner involvement in a cancer clinical trials unit and academic research centre; evaluating its impact
© Hopewell-Kelly et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015
- Published: 29 May 2015
- Staff Member
- Public Involvement
- Cancer Clinical Trial
- Trial Management
- Research Partner
Since 2005 lay representatives (‘Research Partners’ – RP) have been involved in the work of a clinical trials unit and academic research centre. Their roles can include attending trial management groups, reviewing documents and chairing and presenting at sub-committees. Where recruitment of RPs was once opportunistic, RPs are now more formally recruited in conjunction with a national public involvement organisation.
The impact of RPs at the research centre had not been examined in-depth, nor research partners’ or staff members’ experiences been previously explored. The TACT study was conducted to investigate the input and impact of RPs to ensure the best possible working partnership between the centre and the public is achieved.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with RPs (n= 10) and staff members (n=8). The data were analysed using a Framework approach.
Research partners and members of staff see the RP role as an advocacy role for patients. Although some RPs feel welcomed into the centre and are happy with their level of involvement, others identify more negative points including an apparent bias in the centre’s tendency to use more experienced RPs, the RP role being a funding requirement that is tokenistic in its implementation and the need for greater monitoring and support within the RP role.
Staff members stated that they were unclear about the degree to which RPs should be involved in their work and the processes involved in working alongside RPs. Although there was a general recognition that greater commitment was required of them in the RP initiative, time pressures and stresses were cited as barriers in achieving this aim.
The evaluation demonstrated that the RP role is generally valued and enjoyed by RPs but this is only theoretically reciprocated by members of staff who face challenges and barriers in fully committing to the RP initiative.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.