Skip to main content

Table 6 Identification of research subjects in the cluster-cluster, professional-cluster, and individual-cluster trial scenarios

From: Variability in research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: a scenario-based survey in three countries

 

Frequency (%)

Cluster-cluster trial

Yes

No

All city residents in the intervention arm

50 (29.8)a

118 (70.2)

All city residents in the control arm

46 (27.9)a

119 (72.1)

Residents exposed to the advertisements

68 (39.5)a

104 (60.5)

Residents in intervention arm receiving screening

72 (42.1)a

99 (57.9)

Residents participating in the telephone survey

171 (90.0)a

19 (10.0)

Professional-cluster trial

Yes

No

Patient-level:

  

All patients in the practices

37 (22.6)

127 (77.4)a

Patients presenting with back or knee pain

63 (38.4)

101 (61.6)a

Patients providing data for study outcome 1

64 (38.6)

102 (61.5)a

Patients providing data for study outcome 2

104 (62.3)a

63 (37.7)

Professional-level:

  

All GPs in intervention practices

109 (66.9)a

54 (33.1)

All GPs in control practices

103 (63.6)a

59 (36.4)

GPs whose patients present with back or knee pain

127 (77.4)a

37 (22.6)

Individual-cluster trial

Yes

No

Residents receiving bed nets

158 (88.3)a

21 (11.7)

Residents in control arm receiving no bed nets

139 (79.9)a

35 (20.1)

Residents providing blood samples

177 (98.3)a

3 (1.7)

Village malaria workers

58 (36.7)

100 (63.3)a

  1. aIndicates that an answer is in agreement with the Ottawa Statement. GPs, general practitioners.