Peer Review reports
From: A review of the handling of missing longitudinal outcome data in clinical trials
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shona Fielding |
10 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Peacock |
18 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Powney |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shona Fielding |
17 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Peacock |
26 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Powney |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Peacock |
1 May 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Powney |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 May 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 May 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Powney |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 May 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
22 May 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Jun 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-237 |
You can find further information about peer review here.