Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Estimating effect of intervention delivery in the evaluation of complex intervention with various levels of compliance

  • 1, 2,
  • 3,
  • 4 and
  • 1, 2
Trials201314 (Suppl 1) :O89

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-S1-O89

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Schizophrenia
  • Social Science
  • Randomise Control Trial
  • Randomise Trial
  • Health Intervention

The evaluation of complex intervention with a randomised trial is often undermined by varying levels of participant compliance to the intervention. It is important to evaluate the causal effect of different levels of the intervention to gain a fuller understanding of the effectiveness of the intervention when complied with. For example, when evaluating a psychotherapeutic intervention, the effect of attending a session, in addition to the intention-to-treat effect of being offered the therapy, is valuable. Instrumental variables (IV) approach can be used for the estimation of such effect, by handling confounders usually associated with compliance. IV relies on the use of an "instrument", related to the dependent variable only through its effect on the independent variable. Although instrumental variables have been commonly used in econometrics and social sciences, they are seldom applied to the evaluation of complex health intervention. In this presentation, we will demonstrate how the randomisation can be used as an instrument to determine the causal effect of the intervention. We will discuss the theory and assumptions underpinning this approach, and the scope for applying this method to trials on complex intervention. This will be illustrated through a large three-arm randomised controlled trial of art therapy for schizophrenia (MATISSE) where attendance at the intervention sessions was low, and non-compliance was an important limitation for interpreting trial results. The use of instrumental variable techniques enabled a fuller understanding of the effect of the intervention.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UCL PRIMENT CTU, London, UK
(2)
UCL Department of Primary Care and Population Health, London, UK
(3)
Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College, London, UK
(4)
Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK

Copyright

© Leurent et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement