Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: “Spin” in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes

Original Submission
11 Jun 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Boutron
25 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Satyanarayana Vedula
12 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jo Dumville
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Satyanarayana Vedula
26 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Boutron
9 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jo Dumville
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jo Dumville
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jo Dumville
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Oct 2013 Editorially accepted
6 Nov 2013 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-14-371

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page