Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Hill |
| 11 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Gregory Fox |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Hill |
| 25 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Graham |
| 15 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Gregory Fox |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 3 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Hill |
| 9 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Graham |
| 17 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Gregory Fox |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 17 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 4 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Hill |
| 4 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Graham |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Oct 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Oct 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-342 |
You can find further information about peer review here.