Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
21 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
26 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers |
2 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
5 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers |
10 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
10 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
16 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
16 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
22 Apr 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
10 May 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-135 |
You can find further information about peer review here.