Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - yackoob seedat |
| 16 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fabio Angeli |
| 18 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Flack |
| 19 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Staessen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 23 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - yackoob seedat |
| 26 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fabio Angeli |
| 18 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Flack |
| 15 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Staessen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 23 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - yackoob seedat |
| 2 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Flack |
| 13 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Staessen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 21 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Flack |
| 23 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Staessen |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 17 May 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-59 |
You can find further information about peer review here.