Skip to main content

Table 5 Data concerning the trial period of countries participating in the FAITH trial

From: Central coordination as an alternative for local coordination in a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the FAITH trial experience

 

NL

(N = 14)

CA

(N = 11)

US

(N = 29)

P-value

Time between ethics approval and start trial (days)

41 (10 - 139)

232 (98 - 423)

87 (45 - 255)

0.027a

Enrolment period (days)

423 (381 - 509)

482 (267 - 663)

283 (142 - 360)

0.001b

Inclusions

13 (7 - 27)

3 (0 - 5)

3 (1 - 6)

< 0.001c

Registered patients

23 (12 - 36)

54 (3 - 75)

16 (5 - 27)

0.060

Patients missed for registration1

35 (10 - 81)

Unknown

Unknown

 

Inclusions (n per month)

1.03 (0.43 - 2.21)

0.14 (0.00 - 0.28)

0.31 (0.09 - 0.62)

< 0.001d

Total patients (n per month)

2.49 (1.60 - 3.64)

2.76 (0.60 - 8.75)

1.96 (1.11 - 3.75)

0.574

Proportion inclusions (% of total)

34.4 (23.8 - 62.6)

3.93 (0.00 - 13.2)

16.7 (2.50 - 31.3)

0.001e

Proportion patients that were missed for registration of total1 (%)

57.4 (32.2 - 65.2)

Unknown

Unknown

 

Completed follow-ups (%)

82.6 (80.0 - 84.6)

83.5 (72.7 - 95.2)

70.0 (60.0 - 88.1)

0.217

Follow-ups in window (%)

77.1 (71.0 - 82.2)

85.9 (81.0 - 95.0)

85.7 (70.0 - 100.0)

0.073

  1. NL, the Netherlands; CA, Canada; US, United States.
  2. Numbers in the headers represent the number of sites per country that data were available for.
  3. Data are presented as median with P25-P75 given between brackets.
  4. Statistics were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA.
  5. 1 Data available for NL only.
  6. Post-hoc pair wise comparisons were performed using a Mann-Whitney U-test: a Statistical significance was reached when comparing NL vs. CA (p = 0.010), other groups: not significant. b Statistical significance was reached when comparing NL vs. US (p < 0.001), other groups: not significant. c Statistical significance was reached when comparing NL vs. CA (p = 0.002) and NL vs. US (p < 0.001), CA vs. US: not significant. d Statistical significance was reached when comparing NL vs. CA (p = 0.001) and NL vs. US (p = 0.001), CA vs. US: not significant. e Statistical significance was reached when comparing NL vs. CA (p < 0.001) and NL vs. US (p = 0.009), CA vs. US: not significant.