Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 4 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dalane W. Kitzman |
| 3 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Romain Eschalier |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 3 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Romain Eschalier |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 13 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dalane W. Kitzman |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 20 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Romain Eschalier |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 20 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 21 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Romain Eschalier |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 21 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Mar 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Mar 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-25 |
You can find further information about peer review here.